查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 外在注意焦點提高曲棍球精熟者推球的準確性與穩定性=Enhancing Pushing Accuracy and Stability through an External Focus of Attention in Hockey Experts |
---|---|
作 者 | 林靜兒; 李幸陵; | 書刊名 | 體育學報 |
卷 期 | 51:3 2018.09[民107.09] |
頁 次 | 頁345-355 |
分類號 | 993.5 |
關鍵詞 | 高中運動員; 動態注意焦點; 單一注意焦點; OPTIMAL; Senior high school athlete; Dynamic focus of attention; Pure focus of attention; OPTIMAL theory; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 緒論:目前的研究發現外在注意焦點有益於個體的動作技能表現,但對精熟者而言除了固定或單一的注意焦點外,動態注意焦點亦可能是影響精熟者動作表現的重要因素之一,因此,本研究探討單一注意焦點及動態注意焦點對精熟者推球動作的效應。方法:招募 18名高中男子曲棍球校隊運動員 (平均年齡 16.5 ± 0.8歲,平均球齡 3.9 ± 2.1年),採用受試者內設計讓實驗參加者在外在注意焦點、內外動態注意焦點及近遠動態注意焦點情境下各完成 5次推球,共計 15球,每次試作後記錄得分、落點座標、推球速度及填寫依照指導語完成實驗工作程度的自我評估表,並在完成所有試作後填寫注意焦點策略問卷。結果:經相依樣本單因子變異數分析發現, (一) 外在注意焦點的得分 (35.89 ± 8.33分) 顯著高於內外動態 (26.78 ± 11.44分) 與近遠動態注意焦點 (25.89 ± 12.28分)。(二) 外在注意焦點的離心誤差 (75.96 ± 22.53公分)、內外動態注意焦點的離心誤差 (84.49 ± 26.88公分) 與近遠動態注意焦點的離心誤差 (84.14 ± 21.92公分) 未達統計顯著差異。 (三) 外在注意焦點的變異誤差 (54.16 ± 15.37公分)、內外動態注意焦點的變異誤差 (63.59 ± 18.79公分) 與近遠動態注意焦點的變異誤差 (60.52 ± 23.29公分) 未達統計顯著差異。(四) 外在注意焦點擊中標靶的變異誤差 (34.53 ± 9.94公分) 顯著低於內外動態 (50.15 ± 15.14公分) 與近遠動態的注意焦點 (45.31 ± 15.45公分)。本研究的結論認為:曲棍球精熟者使用外在注意焦點相較於內外動態注焦點與近遠動態注意焦點,較能有效的將球推至目標範圍且具有較高的穩定性。 |
英文摘要 | Introduction: Current research was considered that an external focus was beneficial for motor skill performance. However, for expert, in addition to single focus of attention, the dynamic focus of attention probably was an important factor that influenced expert’s motor performance. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of pure and dynamic focus of attention on expert’s pushing performance. Methods: Eighteen male senior high school hockey athletes (age = 16.5 ± 0.8 years, training experience = 3.9 ± 2.1 years) were recruited to participate in the study. Using the within-participant design, each participant completed 5 pushes for each of external focus, internal-external dynamic focus and near-far dynamic focus experimental conditions. All participants completed 15 trials in testing session. Pushing score, coordinates, push speed, and self-assessment of following instruction after every trial were recorded, and participant filled the questionnaire of the focus of attention strategy after completed all trials. Pushing score, radial error, variable error and variable error on the target were calculated for each condition. Data were analyzed by one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results: (a) The pushing score of external focus (35.89 ± 8.33) was significant higher than the internal-external dynamic focus (26.78 ± 11.44) and the near-far dynamic focus (25.89 ± 12.28). (b) The radial error of external focus (75.96 ± 22.53cm), internal-external dynamic focus (84.49 ± 26.88cm) and near-far dynamic focus (84.14 ± 21.92cm) were not significant difference. (c) The variable error of external focus (54.16 ± 15.37cm), internal-external dynamic focus (63.59 ± 18.79cm) and near-far dynamic focus (60.52 ± 23.29cm) were not significant difference. (d) The variable error on the target of external focus (34.53 ± 9.94cm) was significant lower than the internal-external dynamic focus (50.15 ± 15.14cm) and the near-far dynamic focus (45.31 ± 15.45cm). Conclusion: The results showed that expert hockey players adopted the external focus of attention not only makes pushing effectively but also has higher stability rather than internal-external dynamic focus and near-far dynamic focus. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。