查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 驗證LACE指數運用於各專科病人出院30日內再住院或死亡風險評估適配度:以臺灣某醫學中心為例
- 結合LACE、8P工具及醫院整合醫學專科醫師介入創新制度降低出院後30日內再住院率及照護費用:以某醫學中心為例
- 中年及老年人閒暇時間身體活動的改變對全因死亡率之影響
- Quality of Life Patterns and Survival among Older People
- Life Satisfaction as a Predictor of Mortality Hazard among Elderly People in the United Kingdom and Taiwan
- 中老年人身體活動劑量反應對全因死亡率之影響--1996至2007年縱貫性研究
- 921震災對中老年人死亡風險的影響
- APACHE II 於敗血症病患評估的陷阱
- Gender Differences in Hazard Rate Affecting Death in the Elderly Population in Taiwan
- 老人健康折舊與死亡風險:老人整合性照護死亡率之改善
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 驗證LACE指數運用於各專科病人出院30日內再住院或死亡風險評估適配度:以臺灣某醫學中心為例=Validation and Suitability of the LACE Index to Predict the Probability of 30-day Readmission or Death for Patients among Different Clinical Specialties in a Medical Center in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 張政國; 江季蓉; 林玲玉; 孫茂勝; 吳盈瑩; | 書刊名 | 醫務管理期刊 |
卷期 | 18:4 2017.12[民106.12] |
頁次 | 頁269-291 |
分類號 | 419.5 |
關鍵詞 | LACE指數; 30日內再住院; 死亡風險; 風險預測工具; LACE index; 30-day readmission; Mortality risk; Risk prediction tool; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:本研究為驗證常用以預測30日內再住院與死亡風險之LACE指數(以下簡稱LACE)於閉鎖性醫療體系及各專科之適配度。方法:採C統計量分析各專科應用LACE預測與實際狀況之一致性,以羅吉斯迴歸之Omnibus檢定及Hosmer and Lemeshow檢定其適配度。結果:從2014至2015年樣本醫院32個專科共88,559名個案納入研究。分析適用LACE預測30日內再住院或死亡風險之科別為一般內科、感染科、全人醫療科、心臟血管內科、腎臟內科、外傷科、泌尿外科、重建整形暨手外科、骨科及神經醫學科,C統計值範圍自0.585至0.684(p<0.01),預測正確率自84.4至96.4。部分科別由於病人之嚴重度、複雜度與特性不同,適配度不顯著。結論:閉鎖性醫療體系之內、外科系之次專科,多數適用LACE或可經調整而轉為適用;其他獨立專科如婦產科不適用LACE,應針對其病人屬性來發展適合的預測指標。 |
英文摘要 | Objectives: The LACE index (hereinafter referred to as LACE) is a tool for predicting the probability of 30-day re-admission or early death. The suitability of LACE with respect to closed physician-hospital organizations still needs to be verified. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether or not LACE can be applied to closed physician-hospital organizations and clinical specialties. Methods: C-statistics was used to analyze the consistency of LACE in a prediction model. The Omnibus and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests of logistic regression were used to measure suitability. Results: A total of 88,559 cases from 32 clinical specialties in a medical center from 2014-2015 were included in this study. LACE was shown to be suitable for predicting the probability of 30-day re-admission or death for specialties, such as general internal medicine, infectious disease, holistic medicine, cardiovascular internal medicine, nephrology, trauma surgery, urology, reconstructive, plastic and hand surgery, orthopedics, and neurology. The results of the C-statistic were 0.585-0.684 (p<0.01), and the H-L test exhibited predictive accuracy of 84.4-96.4. The factors for different specialties such as disease severity, complexity, and care needs, may affect the discriminative ability of LACE to predict the probability of readmission or death. Conclusions: LACE was shown to be suitable for the majority of specialties in internal medicine and surgery within closed physician-hospital organizations. Adding variables may change LACE suitability in some specialties. Independent specialties, such as obstetrics, were not shown to be not suitable for LACE. Hence, these specialties should develop a predictive tool that is suitable for patient characteristics. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。