頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 賦體之「式微」與文體之「滋廣」--從〈漢志〉〈隋志〉看 「唐無賦」與「賦莫盛於唐」之爭=The Development of Fu between Han and Tang Dynasty: Based upon the Comparison between Han-Shu Yiwen-Zhi and Sui-Shu Jingji-Zhi |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡智力; | 書刊名 | 輔仁國文學報 |
卷 期 | 45 2017.10[民106.10] |
頁 次 | 頁95-137 |
分類號 | 821.92 |
關鍵詞 | 漢書.藝文志; 隋書.經籍志; 漢賦; 唐賦; 文獻文化學; Han-Shu Yiwen-Zhi; Sui-Shu Jingji-Zhi; Han Fu; Tang Fu; Literature-culturology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 《漢書.藝文志》在一級分類單元中設置〈詩賦略〉,作爲六略又一,顯現漢代賦學的空前發展。對比〈漢志〉,《隋書,經藉志》各級分類單元中均無賦學的一席之地;各種賦類專書都分散於〈別集〉或〈總集〉之中。這種轉變,似乎印證了明代以來進行的「唐無賦」之說。但經過深入的文獻文化學分析可知,賦學的這種表面上的式微,其實是在經歷魏晉文體爆發時期以後,在文學全面興盛的映襯下所呈現的相對式微。此時賦學就自身之縱向邏輯而言,確有長足發展;但就文學整體之横向邏輯言,賦已非時代主流文體,而是「日以滋廣」的隋唐文學之滄海一粟。全篇主體分三部分論述,首先在「唐無賦」與「賦莫盛於唐」之爭的背景下,略論傳統文學史書寫的壓縮現與書目文獻的文化學意義,然後分別析論〈漢志〉與〈隋志〉對賦類圖書之著錄與部次,以探析其中所隱含的文化義涵。 |
英文摘要 | Hau-Shu Yiwen-Zhi ("Treatise on Literature" in the Book of Han) 漢書藝文志, consisting of "Shi-Fu-Lue"詩賦略as one of the six chapters of the book, indicates an unprecedented great development of Fu賦 in Han dynasty. In contrast, in Sui-Shu Jingji-Zhi ("Classics" in the Book of Sui)隋書經籍志, there is not special chapter of Fu, therefore, Fu literatures are scattered into "Bie-ji 別集and "Zong-ji" 總集. It seems to testify a perspective prevalent from Ming Dynasty, which considered that there was no Fu any longer since Tang Dynasty. Actually, an in-depth literature-culturology analysis shows that, the surface decline of Fu was a relative decline against the background of the comprehensive prosperity of literature after the We-Jim Dynasty, when is regarded as the age of self-consciousness of literature. Fu, dung this period, in terms of its own development logic, really had developed by leaps and bounds However, considering the overall development logic of literature, Fu was just a drop in the Sui and Tang literature, rather than the mainstream style of literature that era. To discuss the issues above, the main body of this article is divided into three sections, the first of which describes the compression phenomenon of the traditional literature history-writing, as well as the cultural significance of traditional bibliographies, while the remaining of which analyzes the compilation logic on Fu literatures of Yiwen-Zhi and Jingji-Zhi separately, in order to explore the cultural implication in the two bibliographies. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。