查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 從債務危機評述希臘民主治理的困境
- 如今,批判還可能嗎?--與汪暉商榷一個批判的現代主義計畫及其問題
- 為何反全球化?如何反?--關於全球化的一些問題的思考與對話
- 公共決策正當性之省思--一個民主行政之觀點
- 歐洲制憲會議對歐盟民主化之影響
- 全球化、民主化與勞工權益:以臺灣為例 (1949-2003)
- 規範性的戰略?--民主社會化下的新思維[評Amichai Magen (阿米查.梅根), Thomas Risse (托馬士.雷斯) and Michael A. McFaul (麥可.馬克福), eds., Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law: American and European Strategies (推廣民主與法治--美國與歐盟的大戰略)(Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)]
- 審議式超國家主義
- 搭建一座連結社群的橋--「新黃金定律」評介
- 國際和國內因素對前蘇聯地區國家民主化影響之硏究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從債務危機評述希臘民主治理的困境=The Debt Crisis and the Predicament of Democratic Governance in Greece |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 盧倩儀; | 書刊名 | 東吳政治學報 |
卷期 | 35:3 2017.12[民106.12] |
頁次 | 頁179-260 |
分類號 | 565.495 |
關鍵詞 | 希臘債務危機; 歐盟; 撙節; 新自由主義; 民主; Greek Debt Crisis; European Union; Austerity; Neoliberalism; Democracy; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 從希臘債務危機的因到果,「民主政治」扮演什麼樣的角色?甚或是否有角色?民主政治在此過程中受到什麼樣的衝擊?該如何理解民主選舉不斷反映人民向左走的企盼;然而危機之中,左派政府之施政卻在人民諒解下頻頻向右偏的現象?一般民眾在主流媒體的影響下對希臘的慘況即便寄予同情,多少攙雜了「希臘是自食惡果」之印象。然而問題是否果真如此簡單?債權國的所作所為是否經得起歷史的檢驗?相關區域及國際組織究竟是維護了還是踐踏了民主?本文檢視希臘政府自2010至2015年7月所吞下之撙節藥方及其效果,分析債權國對病灶的診斷,繼之參考一波波個別或者聯名對歐元區領袖及財長提出反撙節呼籲之學者的立論,探討希債危機深層的原因以及握有權力的菁英們不願正視問題之結構性理由。在對希債危機之實際病因以及官方診斷背後之動機有了初步瞭解後,本文將進一步闡述希債危機如何使原本黑暗的角落曝了光,照亮了民主政治所深陷的困境。 |
英文摘要 | What role does democratic politics play in the cause, the treatment, and the reflection process of the Greek debt crisis? Or does it have a role? What is the impact of the crisis on democracy? How do we explain the phenomena where, repeatedly, voters express their wish for Left -leaning, anti-austerity policies, yet the subsequent policies delivered by the anti-austerity government continues to turn Right with more and more draconian austerity measures? Fed by reports of mainstream media, the general public-even those sympathetic to the Greeks going through tremendous suffering-tend to have the impression that the Greeks "deserve" this because of the profligacy in the previous era. Is this impression an over-simplification of what actually happened? How will the interpretation and treatment of the crisis by the Troika be judged by history? Have the relevant regional and international organizations protected or undermined democracy? This article examines the effects of the medicine taken by Greece as prescribed by the Troika between 2010 and July 2015, followed by an investigation of reasons provided by those who criticized the prescription and warned against further austerity. It then provides an explanation for the stubborn refusal of the Troika to respond to the criticisms and warnings from the world's top economists. Based on this explanation, the article elaborates on the enlightening effect of the Greek debt crisis on the predicament of democratic politics. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。