查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 發展中文版精神病患社會參與自我效能量表=Developing the Chinese Version of Self-Efficacy for Social Participation among Mental Illness in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 林美伶; 陳宗弘; | 書刊名 | 精神衛生護理雜誌 |
卷 期 | 12:1 2017.09[民106.09] |
頁 次 | 頁14-24 |
分類號 | 415.952 |
關鍵詞 | 社會參與; 自我效能; 精神病患; 心理計量; Social participation; Self-efficacy for social participation; SESP; Patients with mental illness; Psychological measurement; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 背景:病人回歸職場或適應社會生活為精神科病人復健最終目標。在病人復健過程具有多重面向,其中社會參與自我效能扮演復原過程中的關鍵因素。目的:本研究目的在發展中文版精神病患社會參與自我效能量表信效度,藉以日本學者發展出之精神病患社會參與自我效能量表為基礎,發展適用於台灣精神病患社會參與自我效能之量表。方法:採橫斷式研究設計,進行日文版精神病患社會參與自我效能量表雙向翻譯及內容效度檢測,於量表確立後採方便取樣,選取社區精神病患300位,採用自填量表方式,研究工具為中文化後之精神病患社會參與自我效能量表。本研究以驗證性因素分析與探索性因素分析確認建構效度。內在一致性檢測信度與內在等級相關係數檢測穩定度。結果:本研究發現原始27題中文版精神病患社會參與自我效能量表的模式適配度不甚理想,去除二題不良題項後,以因素分析萃取出「動機意向」與「自我管理」二個構面,累積解釋變異量為59.051%,模式適配度良好,且Cronbach's α為.964,具有良好內在一致性。討論:本研究結果證明中文版精神病患社會參與之自我效能量表為具有良好建構效度及內在信度,並可供研究者和臨床專家用來測量和評估精神病患之社會參與。 |
英文摘要 | Background: The ultimate goal of rehabilitation to patients suffering from mental illness is to help them return to work and/or adapt themselves to social lives. There are different dimensions of the social participation, among which the self-efficacy for social participation (SESP) is an important factor in the recovery process. Purpose: The purpose of this study is based on Japanese SESP scale to develop a scale on self-efficacy for social participation in Taiwan.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the self-efficacy for social participation scale. The Chinese version of the SESP (SESP-Chinese version) scale was translated from the original Japanese version using standard process to Chinese. In addition to referencing to the face validity conducting by 5 experts, the authors recruited 300 patients having mental illness from a psychiatric hospital in Central Taiwan. This study adopted Cronbach’s α, CFA and EFA to assess reliability and validity of SESP among mental illness in Taiwan. Results: 27 items of SESP-Chinese version showed poor results in the goodness-of-fit of the hypothetical measurement model. Further, 2 items were deleted through factor analysis. Two factors were identified by factor analysis: intention/motivation and self-management. It totally explained 59.051% of variation for the Chinese version of SESP scale. Finally, the study also used confirmed factor analysis to make sure the scale which will have good fitness in SESP. The Cronbach's α was .964 for the whole scale. Conclusion: Our results suggested that the Chinese-version of SESP scale had satisfactory reliability and validity fulfillment. The scale is feasible for any mental health professional to use on measuring social participation for patients having mental illness. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。