查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 錢穆論姚際恆=Chien Mu Making Comments On Yao Jiheng |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 張曉生; | 書刊名 | 淡江中文學報 |
卷期 | 37 2017.12[民106.12] |
頁次 | 頁203-230 |
分類號 | 782.88 |
關鍵詞 | 錢穆; 姚際恆; 顧頡剛; 辨偽; 古史辨; Chien Mu; Yao Jiheng; Gu Tserkong; Identification; Distinguish the Ancient History; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 姚際恆(1647-約1715),字立方,號首源,清初安徽休寧人,著有《九經通論》、《古今偽書考》、《好古堂書目》等書。姚際恆在清初的學術活動主要表現在經籍辨偽, 根據可見的資料,其辨偽工作範圍頗廣,在當時也頗有影響,但是乾嘉之後逐漸消沈、著作亦散佚嚴重。不過姚際恆之學,卻在民國初年的「整理國故」運動中,發生了十分顯著的作用。以筆者所知,在民國9年至34年間,共有胡適、顧頡剛、錢穆、何定生、柳詒徵、陳柱等人對於姚際恆著作及學術進行搜訪與研究。在這些研究者中,胡適、顧頡剛對於姚際恆著作及生平的探求最為積極,所得也最多,而他們強勁的學術活動力,在當時鼓動了研究姚際恆的風潮,但是其大部分的學者對於姚際恆學術的觀察重點,皆放在他「勇於疑古」的學術表現。錢穆先生是除了顧頡剛之外對於姚際恆最為注意的學者,他在《中國近三百年學術史》第六章〈閻潛邱、毛西河〉、〈記姚立方禮記通論〉、〈清儒學案序〉、〈續記姚立方詩經通論〉等文中對於姚際恆學術著重在分析其「疑古」特質的學術淵源,及其在清初學術環境中的定位,呈現了一位「時代中」的姚際恆,本文即以錢先生所著研究姚際恆相關論述,解讀錢先生所理解的姚際恆學術特質,及其在清初學術史中,應當如何定位。 |
英文摘要 | Yao Jiheng performed his academic activities mainly on books distinguished in the early Qing Dynasty. According to the available information, the range of his distinguishing job was very widespread. He had great influence on the contemporary era. However after the Chien and Jia Emperors, he was downhearted gradually and his writings were seriously scattered and disappeared. Yet Yao's study turned out very obvious effect on the "Sort out the Country's Antiquities" movement during the early years of the Republic of China. To my knowledge, there were many people including Hu Shi, Gu Tser-kong, Chien Mu, Ho Dingsheng, Liou Yicheng and Chen Ju proceeded study on Yao's writings and academic records from 1920 to 1945. Among these researchers, Hu Shi and Gu Tser-kong were the most enthusiastic persons to explore Yao Jiheng's writings and his life and they attained the most. Their energetic academic actions encouraged people to study Yao Jiheng at that time. The other researchers mostly observed Yao's academic points just to put the stress on his academic performance on "brave enough to doubt the ancient". Except Gu Tserkong, Mr. Chien Binshi the scholar who paid most attentively to Ya Jiheng. He put great stress on analyze Yao Jiheng's academic origin of his characteristics of "doubt the antiquities" and his position in the academic environment of Qing Dynasty to present a "Contemporary" Yao Jiheng in his own writings such as "Hostory of Chinese Learning During the Last Three Centuries" Chapter Six (Yen Chienchiu, Mao Shiho), "Recordings on Yao Lifang's Introduction on Book of Rites", "Qing Dynasty Confucianism Preface" and "Recordings on General Theory of Yao Lifang's the book of Songs". The present study interprets Yao's academic characteristics which was understood by Mr. Chien and from his study on the related points about Yao Jiheng. Therefore we can position Yao in the academic history of early Qing Dynasty. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。