查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣竹竹苗區域地方政府幸福城市評量分析=The Study of Happiness Appraisal for Local Governments in Taiwanese ChuChuMiao Area |
---|---|
作者 | 黃國敏; Hwang, Edward K.; |
期刊 | 中華行政學報 |
出版日期 | 20170600 |
卷期 | 20 2017.06[民106.06] |
頁次 | 頁59-89 |
分類號 | 545.5 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 幸福城市; 評量指標; 地方政府; Happiness power; Appraisal indicator; Local government; |
中文摘要 | 根據《天下雜誌》2004-2016年《地方政府幸福城市排名調查》資料分析,新竹縣政府各項幸福指數以經濟力面向的表現最佳,其次是文教力面向與社福力面向,表現最差是施政力面向;新竹市政府各項幸福指數以經濟力面向的表現最佳,其次是文教力面向與社福力面 向,表現較差是環境力面向,苗栗縣政府各項幸福指數面向表現差不多,都是在中段班左右,其中以環境力面向與經濟力面向的表現較佳,而施政力面向與社福力面向的表現稍弱;值得 注意的是2012年,苗栗縣政府各項幸福指數五大面向與幸福指數總排名表現優異,全部都列為前段班。描述統計資料顯示竹竹苗區域三個縣政府幸福城市指數,經濟力面向與文教力面向在非六都幸福城市平均排名表現最優,環境力面向與施政力面向在非六都幸福城市平均排名表現較差。從變異數分析(ANOVA)發現,新竹市政府與新竹縣政府在經濟力面向顯然優於苗 栗縣政府,新竹市政府在社福力面向顯然優於新竹縣政府與苗栗縣政府,新竹市政府在幸福 指數總體排名顯然優於新竹縣政府與苗栗縣政府。幸福指數總排名只有新竹市政府位在前後段,新竹縣政府屬中段班,苗栗縣政府的幸福指數總排名則在後段班。 |
英文摘要 | According to the 2004-2016 annual surveys by the Common Wealth Magazine, the economic power and cultural education power of the ChuChuMiao 3 county/city governments are excellent, but the other dimensions- environmental power and administrative power have to be improved. Comparing the total happiness powers among the ChuChuMiao 3 county/city governments, only HsinChu city government ranks at the top, HsinChu county at the middle and Miaoli county government ranks at the down. The local government must construct the "competitive performance indicators" to examine their performance in order to upgrade the competitive powers. As the core element of TQM, performance appraisal has to collect and analyze the service outputs. The main critic to governments is their focusing only on "inputs" but ignoring "outputs". Since the goal of governmental reengineering is to construct the new governments with the entrepreneurial spirit, administrative outputs rather than inputs must be assessed as the appraisal model for governmental performance. Local governments must adopt "performance competitive assessment" as an incentive to executive administrative reform. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。