頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 價值增加模式運用於教師效能評鑑之探討=Inquiry on Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation with Value-Added Models |
---|---|
作 者 | 張伯瑲; | 書刊名 | 學校行政 |
卷 期 | 102 2016.03[民105.03] |
頁 次 | 頁120-139 |
分類號 | 526.63 |
關鍵詞 | 價值增加模式; 教師效能評鑑; 學生測驗成績; Value-Added Models; Teacher effectiveness evaluation; Student test scores; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文透過文獻探討採用學生測驗成績進行教師效能評鑑的發展脈絡與議題,美國的教師評鑑近年來倡行實施直接採用學生在標準測驗中的評量分數的價值增加模式(VAM),VAM 是一項以學生在標準化測驗的成績來量化教師效能的統計工具,支持者認為可以把特定教師價值增加的程度獨立出來,可以區分教師有效能或無效能,但批評者認為價值增加評估是不可靠的。綜合文獻,本文提出VAM討論的議題包括:1.教師與學生的非隨機分配、2.不穩定的教師成就評量結果、3.教師效用難以獨立、4.窄化課程與教學、5.不利教師協同與合作、6.邊際誤差的問題、7.忽略學生需求、8.資料錯誤的後果,最後本文提出採用VAM進行教師效能評鑑的建議,包括:1.避免高比重的價值增加評鑑、2.注意評鑑的要素、3.較適用於群體評鑑、4.用做教師專業發展計畫、5.減少誤差的影響和6.對評鑑結果進行檢視及評鑑。 |
英文摘要 | The objective of this paper is inquiry the context and issuses about using student test scores to evaluate teacher effectiveness. In recent years, Value-Added Models (VAM) have been adopted to evaluate teachers in USA. Advocators claim that VAM is useful when one wants to know how a particular teacher’s contributions to student improvement compare to the average teacher, then they can distinguish “effective” or “ineffective” teachers. Therefore, more student Value-Added scores more teaching effective. Opponents considered that VAM is unreliable and could not be used to rank teachers. Finally, there are many suggestions listed in this paper , includeing: (1). avoid high weights for Value-Added evaluation; (2). pay attention to all components of the evaluation; (3). be appropriate used for teams evaluation; (4). be one of the teacher professional development plans; (5). reduce the influence of error and (6). continually evaluate the evaluations. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。