查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 溫柔的反叛:從舞鶴的《餘生》看認同書寫與見證書寫的倫理與美學問題
- 非關認同:從儂曦、舞鶴談「共時性」的倫理
- 重訪人文主義--從沙特、海德格、德希達到牟宗三
- 頁碼之外--評《思索阿邦.卡露斯》
- 從文本到「文字書寫」--德希達對書寫的解構理論研究(1)
- Derrida and Possibilities of Reading
- 空無之必要德希達的文學擬設與倫理學問題
- 從文本到「文字書寫」--德希達對書寫的解構理論研究(2)
- Making Sense of Political Learning: The Case of Forming Identities in Taiwan
- 評孟樊著《後現代的認同政治》
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 溫柔的反叛:從舞鶴的《餘生》看認同書寫與見證書寫的倫理與美學問題=A Gentle Revolt: Examining the Ethic and Aesthetic Issues of Identity Politics and Testimonial Literature from Wu He's Remains of Life |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 邵毓娟; | 書刊名 | 臺灣學誌 |
| 卷 期 | 15 2017.04[民106.04] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-24 |
| 專 輯 | 反叛與規訓 |
| 分類號 | 823.6 |
| 關鍵詞 | 洪席耶; 美學政治; 認同政治; 德希達; 舞鶴; Jacques Rancière; The politics of aesthetics; Identity politics; Jacques Derrida; Wu He; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本篇論文試圖思考美學的反叛與美學如何反叛,最重要的是希望揭顯美學維持自身一種「弱化」卻尖銳的反叛位置。論文中主要討論並串連三個面向:第一部分首先回顧台灣解嚴後的認同政治思考對於文學創作與文學評論形成的開放與侷限;第二部分將借助當代法國哲學家賈克.德希達(Jacques Derrida)與賈克.洪席耶(Jacques Rancière)關於美學政治與倫理議題的思考,他們的美學思索提供了一個非常具有洞見的感知框架,讓我們能夠藉以理解舞鶴書寫《餘生》這樣一個超越「認同書寫」的美學行動所質疑與開創的倫理提問;第三部分則進入《餘生》這部作品,藉由這部小說文本與相關評論,展開《餘生》一書虛構與見證並置的弔詭雙重性,以及這樣的雙重性對於認同政治的倫理與政治思考。這樣的美學思考是一次溫柔的反叛,如此困難卻又如此重要的反叛。 |
| 英文摘要 | This essay dwells upon what aesthetics rebels against and how aesthetics revolts. It aims to reveal that aesthetics places itself in a most self-weakening but sharp revolutionary position. The discussion will focus on three aspects. First, the essay reflects on the insight and limitation to Taiwan literature and criticism formed by the identity politics after the abolishing of Martial Law. In the second part, Jacques Derrida's and Jacques Rancière's thoughts on aesthetic politics and ethical issues are applied to an insightful perceptional framework. Based on this, the ethical question addressed by the aesthetic action of Wu He's Remains of Life, which exceeds "identity writing", can be understood. The last part of the essay analyzes Remains of Life and the relevant comments. The analysis exposes the paradoxical duality of fabrication and witness of this novel and further ponders over the ethics and identity politics of the duality. Wu He's fictional testimony, I would say, is a difficult but important act of gentle revolt. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。