查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 基德勒與魯曼的相互參照:從社會理論視角出發的一次交流
- 知與無知的知識觀:哈耶克社會理論的再研究(上)
- 遠離馬克思、回到康德:論哈柏瑪斯與兩種德國批判傳統的關係
- 中共傳播改革之研究
- 知與無知的知識觀:哈耶克社會理論的再研究(下)
- 福柯與權力分析的新嘗試
- 赫德社會哲學研究
- Media Theory after the Fall of European Communism: Why the Old Models from East and West Won't Do any More
- 如今,批判還可能嗎?--與汪暉商榷一個批判的現代主義計畫及其問題
- 評Frank Webster著,馮建三譯:《資訊社會理論》
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 基德勒與魯曼的相互參照:從社會理論視角出發的一次交流=Cross-Referencing Friedrich Kittler and Niklas Luhmann: An Exchange from the Viewpoint of Social Theory |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 蔡博方; |
作者姓名(外文) | Tsai, Po-fang; |
書刊名 | 傳播研究與實踐 |
卷期 | 7:2 2017.07[民106.07] |
頁次 | 頁93-122 |
分類號 | 541.83 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 弗里德里希.基德勒; 尼可拉斯.魯曼; 媒介理論; 社會理論; 技術媒介; 成功媒介; Friedrich Kittler; Niklas Luhmann; Media theory; Social theory; Technical media; Success media; |
中文摘要 | 本文從社會理論來探討弗里德里希.基德勒( Friedrich Kittler)的媒介理論,並以尼可拉斯.魯曼( Niklas Luhmann)為參考。第二部分以「一般化象徵交換媒介」問題切入,在三種不同理論立場對文化和大眾傳播的定位中,初步確立魯曼的社會系統理論為出發點,以引介基德勒的媒介理論。第三部分介紹基德勒「傳統媒介╱技術媒介」的區分、魯曼「傳散媒介╱成功媒介」的區分,在討論兩者的媒介理論的同時,提出一種對於基德勒的新詮釋。除了被視為傅科( Michel Foucault)或麥克魯漢( Marshall McLuhan)的延續者,基德勒對於資訊流通的「功能性」的重視,使他關聯於魯曼的社會理論。結論部分比較基德勒的「技術媒介」與魯曼的「成功媒介」,並在媒介理論與社會理論的交錯之上,提出三個理論反思。 |
英文摘要 | In this paper, I attempt to introduce Friedrich Kittler’s media theory from a social theory perspective, relying especially on the ideas of Niklas Luhmann. In the second part, I set up “generalized symbolic exchange media” as the problematics to present three different positions in contemporary social theory, comparing their distinct answers to questions concerning the theoretical places of culture and mass media. Based on comparison of these three different social theory perspectives, I argue that Niklas Luhmann’s social system theory can be a crucial link to connect social theorists with the media theorist Kittler. In the third part, I separately introduce Kittler’s distinction of “traditional media/technical media” and Luhmann’s distinction of “dissemination media/success media,” and then compare and contrast their media theories to establish a new interpretation of Kittler: as not a follower of Michel Foucault or Marshall McLuhan, but rather as establishing a new path by emphasizing functionality in information circulation. This interpretation links Kittler with Luhmann. In the conclusion, I provide three theoretical reflections to encourage future interdisciplinary enrichment between media theory and social theory, by cross-referencing Kittler’s “technical media” and Luhmann’s “success media.” |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。