查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 授受補助動詞の習得における暗示的訂正フィードバックの効果--リキャストとプロントの比較
- 指示詞の習得に関する信念と学習ストラテジーとの関連--JSL学習者とJFL学習者との比較
- 学習ストラテジーが現場指示の習得に与える影響について--JSL学習者とJFL学習者との比較
- 明示的訂正フィ-ドバックが非現場指示の習得に与える影響--直接訂正とメタ言語的訂正の比較
- 「非現場指示」の指導における暗示的訂正フィードバックの効果--リキャスト、リキャスト強化、文法説明の比較
- 胡塞爾「重述」歷史觀思想初探--以「幾何學起源」為解釋線索
- 口譯教學中重述的教法與效果
- A Study of Children's Comprehension Processes by using "Retelling after Solving" Technique
- Self-Regulation of Discourse Schema in Spoken and Written Recall--A Comparison between Chinese and British Children in North England
- 公民身分的多重性及其民主政治的意涵
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 授受補助動詞の習得における暗示的訂正フィードバックの効果--リキャストとプロントの比較=關於暗示性之訂正回饋對學習授受補助動詞所帶來的效果--重述及促進自我訂正之比較、The Effectiveness of Implicit Corrective Feedback toward the Acquisition of Benefactive Auxilliary Verbs--The Comparison between Recasts and Prompts |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 孫愛維; | 書刊名 | 臺大日本語文研究 |
| 卷 期 | 31 2016.06[民105.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁71-97 |
| 分類號 | 803.165 |
| 關鍵詞 | 暗示性訂正回饋; 重述; 促進自我訂正; 授受補助動詞; 臺灣日語學習者; 暗示的訂正フィードバック; 台湾人の日本語学習者; リキャスト; プロント; Implicit corrective feedback; Recasts; Prompts; Benefactive auxilliary verbs; Taiwanese learners; |
| 語 文 | 日文(Japanese) |
| 中文摘要 | 研究爲針對62名台灣日語學習者進行實驗藉以探討暗示性訂正回饋對於學習者之授受補助動詞學習的影響。其成效分別針對學習者的言語理解跟言語運用兩層面,以誤用訂正測驗、看圖說話測驗、聽力測驗之3種方式,並分別進行前測、後測、2週後延宕後測予以衡量。研究結果發現:雖然暗示性訂正回饋的效果會因暗示性訂正回饋之種類,測量方法,測量時期而有所不同,但整體而言依然肯定暗示性訂正回饋之效果。此外,雖然並無發現暗示性訂正回饋之持續效果,但是看圖說話測驗的部份,促進自我訂正組比重述組高。由此可知,促進學習者自己訂正錯誤比重述更能促進學習者的授受補助動詞之學習。這可能是因為促進自我訂正較重述更能有效矯正助詞的誤用 |
| 英文摘要 | This research was concentrated on the effectiveness of implicit corrective feedback toward the acquisition of benefactive auxilliary verbs by investigating 62 Taiwan students of Japanese. The effectiveness was measured by error correction, oral task and listening comprehension test. A pretest, a posttest and a 2-weeks delayed posttest were administered. The results showed that, although the effectiveness of implicit corrective feedback was different according to types of corrective feedback, outcome measure and timing, the effectiveness of implicit corrective feedback was discovered overall. Moreover, although the effectiveness of implicit corrective feedback was not maintained prompts generated more gains than recasts on the oral task. These findings suggest that prompts were more effective than recasts to the acquisition of benefactive auxilliary verbs. This might be due to that prompts were more effective than recasts when the errors were on the particles |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。