查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- The Relationship between the Inflammatory Results of Postpartum Papanicolaou Test and Breastfeeding Methods: A Retrospective Study
- 影響哺母乳產婦滿月時哺餵方式相關因素之探討
- 探討產婦之純母乳哺餵經驗
- 照護一位曾患有乳腺炎經產婦之產後哺乳護理經驗
- 以嬰兒引導的母乳哺餵提升產後哺乳婦女哺餵舒適度之改善專案
- 一位產後出血行子宮全切除經產婦哺餵母乳之護理經驗
- 產後婦女社會支持和母乳哺餵態度相關性探討
- 產後婦女之母乳哺餵自我效能、疲憊與哺乳意圖之相關性
- Delayed Postpartum Hemorrhage in Adenomyosis: A Case Report
- 某醫學中心婦女做子宮頸抹片檢查與其影響因素之探討
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Relationship between the Inflammatory Results of Postpartum Papanicolaou Test and Breastfeeding Methods: A Retrospective Study=產後抹片發炎結果與哺餵方式之關係:回溯性研究 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 謝伶瑜; 林肇柏; 呂美君; 林筱青; 羅雪芳; |
作者姓名(外文) | Hsieh, Ling-yu; Lin, Chao-po; Lu, Mei-chun; Lin, Hsiao-ching; Lo, Sheu-fang; |
書刊名 | 輔仁醫學期刊 |
卷期 | 14:3 2016.09[民105.09] |
頁次 | 頁129-136 |
分類號 | 417.38 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 子宮頸抹片檢查; 產後; 母乳哺餵; 發炎; 回溯性研究; Papanicolaou test; Postpartum; Breast-feeding; Inflammation; Retrospective study; |
中文摘要 | 背景與目的:產後婦女子宮頸抹片檢查常呈現發炎反應。本研究採回溯性研究,主要探討產後子宮頸抹片檢查與哺餵方式之關係,以進一步了解執行產後子宮頸抹片之最佳時機。方法:我們收集2008年到2010年台灣南部某區域教學醫院之產後子宮頸抹片檢查數據,排除流產及無法獲得哺餵資料者,有效資料共得3014筆。子宮頸抹片結果分為正常、無感染性發炎及感染性發炎三類。產後接受子宮頸抹片檢查時間區分為小於6週、6-8週、8-12週、大於12週,而哺餵方式分為全母乳、混餵、全配方奶。所得數據以SPSS 21.0軟體進行分析。結果:產後子宮頸抹片發炎結果與生產方式、胎次、母親年齡無關,而產後越晚接受子宮頸抹片檢查,發生無感染性發炎情形遞減(≤ 6週:14.2%;6-8週:10.7%;8-12週:7.4%;>12週:6.8%;p<0.001),而發生感染性發炎情形則遞增(≤ 6週:1.2%;6-8週:1.2%;8-12週:2.5%;>12週:3.1%;p<0.001),再者,全母乳哺餵者較餵食配方奶者有較高的無感染性發炎比例(OR, 95%CI: 1.54, 1.07-2.21)及較低的感染性發炎情形(OR, 95%CI: 0.33, 0.15-0.76)。結論:此前驅性研究發現哺餵方式與子宮頸抹片發炎結果及採檢時間呈顯著相關性。 |
英文摘要 | Background & Aim. "Inflammation" is frequently found among postpartum Pap smear. We conducted a retrospective study to explore the postpartum inflammatory Papanicolaou (Pap) test whether be affected by the breastfeeding behavior and the timing for postpartum Pap test. Methods. Postpartum women received the Pap test examination within 6 months after delivery from 2008-2010 (n=3014). All Pap test interpretation data were collected from a regional teaching hospital. Individuals who had miscarriages and whose feeding information could not be obtained were excluded. The Pap results were classified into 3 groups: normal group, non-infectious inflammation group, and infectious inflammation group. The postpartum timing receiving Pap test were category into ≤6, 6-8, 8-12, and >12 weeks. The breastfeeding methods were classified as exclusive, mixed, and formula milk. The data were further analyzed using the statistical software SPSS 21.0. Results. The Pap result of "inflammation" showed no relationship with the mode of delivery, nulliparous status and maternal age. As the postpartum examination timing increased, the rate of non-infectious inflammation decreased (≤6 weeks: 14.2%; 6-8 weeks: 10.7%; 8-12 weeks: 7.4%; >12 weeks: 6.8%; p<0.001) and the rate of infectious inflammation increased (≤6 weeks: 1.2%; 6-8 weeks: 1.2%; 8-12 weeks: 2.5%; >12 weeks: 3.1%; p<0.001). Comparing with the women with formula milk, the women with exclusive breastfeeding method during the study period had significant higher OR of non-infectious inflammation (OR, 95% CI: 1.54, 1.07-2.21) and lower OR of infectious inflammation (OR, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.15-0.76). Conclusion. This pilot study showed the breastfeeding methods had significant association with the Pap test result and collection timing. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。