查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 誰的風險?誰的管制與檢測標準?蘭嶼核廢料爭議之研究
- 陽明山國家公園計畫內一般管制區之土地利用發展總量評估
- 當前臺灣環境正義的社會基礎
- The Development of Supplementary Rules for 竍 Control Chart under Nonrandom Patterns
- 室內裝潢用材產銷之研究(2)省產造林木做為室內裝潢用材之品質管制及成本分析
- [裁判簡評]檢舉是不是依法申請?--違反環境管制標準案件之訴權及司法審查密度/最高行99裁2658裁定
- 環境法上之污染排放權機制--以美國之實施經驗為中心
- 非常態性資料下中位數管制圖之研究
- 說保育太沉重?--臺灣原住民的「新」課題
- 解除外資匯出管制對國內股市之影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 誰的風險?誰的管制與檢測標準?蘭嶼核廢料爭議之研究=Whose Risk? Whose Regulatory and Test Standards? The Controversy of Nuclear Waste on Orchid Island |
---|---|
作 者 | 范玫芳; | 書刊名 | 傳播研究與實踐 |
卷 期 | 7:1 2017.01[民106.01] |
頁 次 | 頁107-139 |
專 輯 | 氣候變遷與環境風險溝通 |
分類號 | 449.8 |
關鍵詞 | 科技爭議; 風險感知; 核廢料; 管制; 環境正義; Technology controversies; Risk perception; Nuclear waste; Regulation; Environmental justice; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 2011 年11 月媒體報導蘭嶼核廢料貯存場附近檢測出鈷60 和銫137。本文結合環境正義和科技與社會理論觀點,探討蘭嶼核廢料風險評估與管制爭議中,公民行動如何挑戰官方科學論述和環境不正義問題。蘭嶼個案凸顯風險資訊與知識的鴻溝、居民承受多重不公平的交錯、及「應做卻未做的科學」。蘭嶼部落不同世代的反核行動者與反核團體以多元行動表達其訴求,並挑戰官方的輻射管制標準與監測方式。核能管制與研究機構間複雜的共生網絡弱化了科學知識生產的可信度和釋出的風險資訊。本文建議在制度設計上必須強化資訊透明、地方參與和課責性、納入預警原則,並賦權地方族人在風險評估科學知識產製和核廢料治理上扮演關鍵角色,重構部落族人的環境健康風險與福祉。 |
英文摘要 | News media have reported that a researcher detected cobalt 60 and cesium 137 near the nuclear waste repository on Orchid Island in November 2011. This research combined the theoretical perspectives of environmental justice and science and technology studies (STS) to explore risk assessment and the regulatory controversies related to nuclear waste, and how citizen action challenges official scientific claims and problems of environmental injustice. The case highlights the risk knowledge gap, the interplay of multiple injustices, and the problem of undone science. Different generations of indigenous antinuclear waste activists on Orchid Island have collaborated with expert activists and antinuclear organizations to form hybrid antinuclear alliances. These groups took action to express their demands and challenged official regulatory standards and test methods. The complex interest network of nuclear regulatory and research institutions has weakened the credibility of scientific knowledge production and the release of risk information. Institutional design must empower local indigenous people to play a critical role in knowledge production and nuclear waste governance and health risk assessment to seek a solution that is responsive to the local social and cultural rationales and distributive equity. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。