頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 惜時珍載--《河南博物館館刊》的熠煜織錦案=A Legal Case Regarding Collection of Embroidered Brocade from the Bulletin of the Henan Museum |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃璧珍; | 書刊名 | 國立歷史博物館學報 |
卷期 | 54 2016.12[民105.12] |
頁次 | 頁4-18 |
分類號 | 790 |
關鍵詞 | 國立歷史博物館; 河南博物館館刊; 趙惜時; 月字號織錦; National Museum of History; Bulletin of the Henan Museum; Zhao Xi-shi; The Vue Series Brocade Collection; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 河南博物館是1927年在河南省建立的第一所公立博物館,擁有豐富收藏。河南博物館保管部趙惜時主任,在《河南博物館館刊》中記載庋藏月字號織錦文物,其熠煜織錦之圖紋祥韻,令人動容。 1927年,民國16年,李紹賓、王錫普二人,為債務抵押品:織錦和銅鐸告上開封縣法院,由河南省政府判定,一是聽當事人自由處分;二為如其甘愿歸之公家,可共同酌定最低價目,按情理法兼顧,但二人未再出現開封縣法院中,事有蹊翹時,可能此批文物中的精品,是清宮盜賣流落於外的熠煜織錦。 推敲李王二人的織錦案,公家辦案最早法源據於 1916年10月的〈保存古物暫行辦法〉,此法是最早將錦繡類文物,列於國家保護的文物範圍。古物從私人擁有到公家河南博物館藏,是開封省法院、河南高等法院和河南省政府,依法發揮辦理的好成果,也是避免古文物流失民間的好案例。 |
英文摘要 | Henan Museum, founded in 1927, was the first public museum in the Henan Province and has a rich collection of artifacts. In the Bulletin of the Henan Museum, Zhao Xi-shi, Chief of the Collection Division of the Henan Museum, describes the context of and a legal case regarding the yue series brocade collection currently in National Museum of History. In 1927 Li Shao-bin and Wang Xi-pu filed a lawsuit in Kaifeng, Henan, regarding a group of brocade pieces. In the end, the Henan Province Government ruled that they could either take them back or sell them to the government by the mutually-decided price. However, both Li and Wang never returned to the court. Later it was speculated that the said group of brocade was perhaps stolen from the Qing court. In the case mentioned above, the legal base regarding cultural artifact was the Provisional Measure Regarding Protection of Ancient Artifacts promulgated in October 1916. In this Provisional Measure brocade was for the first time included as the national protected artifact. Under this regulation, ancient artifacts in this legal case were moved from dubious private owner to public collection, a great precedent set by Kaifeng Provincial Court, Henan Higher Court and Henan Province Government. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。