查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 由德國經驗看消滅時效起算點之研究
- 消滅時效制度存在理由試論
- 當事人協商與消滅時效制度--由德國經驗看最高法院九十六年度臺上字第二二五○號民事判決之珍貴啟示
- 第二審新攻擊與防禦方法提出容許要件之探討--以第二審消滅時效抗辯與抵銷抗辯之提出為中心
- 時效抗辯權的特殊性--日本時效抗辯案例考察
- 時效抗辯權的特殊性--日本時效抗辯案例考察
- 誠信原則於時效抗辯中之適用--借鑑於日本塵肺訴訟案例
- 變遷中之消滅時效期間起算點--從最高法院九十一年度臺上字第一三一二號等三則判決之啟示談起
- 德國法院闡明義務之新進展--以公元二○○一年德國民事訴訟法修正為中心
- 代位訴訟、時效抗辯與時效中斷--評析中國大陸最高人民法院(二○一一)民提字第七號民事判決
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 由德國經驗看消滅時效起算點之研究=The Beginning Moment of the Extinctive Prescription from the German Experience |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 侯瑞瑗; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷期 | 28:2 2016.10[民105.10] |
頁次 | 頁87-117 |
分類號 | 584.15 |
關鍵詞 | 消滅時效; 請求權可行使時; 時效起算點; 客觀判斷標準; 主權基準; 時效抗辯; Extinctive prescription; The moment when the claim may be exercised; The beginning moment of the extinctive prescription; Objective judging standard; Subjective judging standard; Valid defense of prescription; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我國民法第128 條前段所定自「請求權可行使時」起算時效,要必權利人處於可行使請求權之狀態,亦即其行使請求權並無法律上障礙之客觀狀態,始足當之。消滅時效自請求權可行使時起算,是否處於可行使狀態,應就請求權性質判斷。德國民法於2002 年修正時就消滅時效相關規範做了調整,德國民法第199 條第1 項之規定類似我國民法第197 條第1 項所規定之消滅時效期間雙軌制。消滅時效制度之目的在維持法律之安定性及和平性。德國民法一般消滅時效的起算採客觀及主觀二個判斷基準,採取主觀之認定基準,以權利人知悉權利存在,作為認定消滅時效起算之基準,係重視權利人權益之保護。在消滅時效起算時點之基礎上,本文擬參考德國經驗,對消滅時效起算時點所生法律問題進行分析說明,並整理我國實務及學說見解,提供不同比較法視野,以供參酌。 |
英文摘要 | Article 128 of the Civil Code set out extinctive prescription starts running from the moment when the claim may be exercised, an obligee shall in the state may exercise the right of request. That is, there is no legal obstacle under the objective attribution. The beginning of point of the extinctive prescription is from the moment being claimed, whether it is authorized to exercise shall determine on the nature of the claim. German civil law was amended in 2002 for the extinctive prescription, which provisions of Article 199 paragraph 1 is similar to our Civil Code paragraph 1 of Article 197 the dual system of the extinctive prescription. The purpose of the extinctive prescription system is to maintain the stability and peace of the law. The beginning moment of the generally extinctive prescription of German civil law is based on both objective and subjective judgments. The objective judging standard is similar to our country. The subjective judging standard is based on the time that an obligee known t he right exist, it gives the protection of oblige rights and interests. This paper studies the German experience of the beginning moment of the extinctive prescriptive and provides comparison with our country. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。