頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 社會學的公共書寫:以學術科普部落格為例=Public Sociological Writings: Academic Blogs and Knowledge Dissemination in Taiwan |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 王宏仁; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會學刊 |
| 卷 期 | 59 2016.06[民105.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-27 |
| 分類號 | 541.102 |
| 關鍵詞 | 公共社會學; 網路共筆書寫; 公共性; Public sociology; Collective online writing; Publicity; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 過去兩三年,臺灣出現一波以「網路共筆」方式呈現的學術科普書寫風潮,本文將討論這個臺灣學界特有的現象,以及它具有的在地社會學意涵。我將先討論Burawoy分類的四種學術書寫,接著探討當前臺灣社會學界的社會參與、公共書寫與其對社會的影響,最後則討論學術科普書寫的社會意義。我認為,臺灣學術科普的網路書寫,具有三個面向的公共性意涵:一、它是一種在國家與市場之外的書寫;二、具有學術的問責性(accountability),也就是學術研究者必須對於我們的社會發展狀況負擔一定的責任;三、在此書寫過程中,大眾可以進行參與,是一種民主化的書寫。最後也探討未來此種網路公共書寫的可能發展。 |
| 英文摘要 | In the past decade there has been a wave of online pubic writing organized by various academic communities in Taiwan that is unique when compared to online public writing in other countries. In this paper I use Burawoy’s four types of academic writing to analyze this wave as a form of public sociology. After discussing public sociology as practiced by Taiwan’s sociology community-including its participation in social movements, local communities, policy making, and media-I use STREETCORNER SOCIOLOGY ONLINE (hang’a’kao shehuixue) to illustrate the three meanings of public writing in Taiwan: as an outlet for society as opposed to the state and markets, as a means to express academic accountability, and as a venue for democratic writing to encourage members of the general public to participate in academic dialogue. I conclude the paper by discussing possible directions for the future development of online public writing. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。