查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 新型超級電池應用於複合型燃料電池車之研究=A Novel Application of the UltraBattery on Hybrid Fuel Cell Vehicles |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 郭振坤; 黃俊硯; 黃榮泰; | 書刊名 | 石油季刊 |
卷期 | 52:2 2016.06[民105.06] |
頁次 | 頁115-128 |
分類號 | 468.1 |
關鍵詞 | 燃料電池; 超級電池; 混和動力車; 系統模擬; ECE40; Fuel cell; UltraBattery; Hybrid vehicle; Economic commission for Europe 40; System simulation; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究探討之燃料電池混和動力車,動力配置以質子交換膜燃料電池為主要動力源,輔助動力源分別以鋰離子電池及超級電池進行能量性能比較,並利用Matlab/Simulink 進行模擬,觀察其動態行為與整體性能表現。描述質子交換膜燃料電池、超級電容、鉛酸電池以及超級電池之模型架構,再以ECE40 行車型態測試並探討燃料電池混和動力車之性能表現。在模擬中採用四種不同的能量輸出模式,分別為高負載需求模式、一般需求模式、低負載需求模式及充電模式,模擬馬達能量需求與雙動力源之能量輸出情形。模擬結果顯示鋰電池比超級電池可多回收0.1%的功。以燃料經濟性而言,超級電池只略遜於鋰電池0.1%。若以成本考量,相同規格之超級電池預期成本將會比鋰電池下降35%。當同時考慮燃料經濟性與成本兩種因素下,超級電池對於鋰電池而言將具有很大的競爭力。 |
英文摘要 | The Fuel cell hybrid vehicles discussed in this study, their main power source is a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. An energy performance of a lithium-ion battery is compared with that of UltraBattery as auxiliary power sources. Using different simulation frameworks of four power sources including the proton exchange membrane fuel cell, ultracapacitor, lead-acid battery, and UltraBattery, the Economic Commission for Europe 40 driving cycle is performed to test the performance of the fuel cell hybrid vehicle. Four energy output models are adopted to simulate the energy demand and output of the motor which include the high-load demand, the general demand, the lowload demand, and charge mode. The simulation results indicate that the lithium battery recycles 0.1% more work as compared with the UltraBattery. Regarding fuel economy, the UltraBattery is only 0.1% inferior to the lithium battery. The expected cost of an UltraBattery with the same specifications is 35% less than that of a lithium battery. Considering both fuel economy and cost, the UltraBattery can compete with the lithium battery. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。