查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 後牙錯咬之擴張矯正治療模式:系統性回顧
- 成人骨骼性三級單側前後牙錯咬病例的矯正治療
- 以改良式四環擴張器治療混合齒列期前牙錯咬合併單側後牙錯咬:病例報告
- 矯正治療時的咬合考量
- 下顎第二大臼齒近心埋伏的早期矯正治療
- 以不拔牙矯正治療嚴重虎牙問題
- Post-juvenile Periodontitis Treated with Adjunctive Orthodontic and Prosthodontic Therapy: Report of a Case with Four Years Follow-up
- 不拔牙矯正治療--病例報告
- 矯正治療及顏面生長和顳顎關節症候群的關連
- Combined Treatment of Patients with Reduced Periodontal Support--Cases Report
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 後牙錯咬之擴張矯正治療模式:系統性回顧=The Orthodontic Expansion Treatment of Posterior Crossbite--A Systemic Review |
---|---|
作 者 | 張雅筑; 鄭信忠; 盧泰良; 陳建鋒; 陳怡君; | 書刊名 | 中華民國齒顎矯正學雜誌 |
卷 期 | 27:2 2016.04[民105.04] |
頁 次 | 頁76-89 |
分類號 | 416.97 |
關鍵詞 | 後牙錯咬; 矯正治療; 系統性回顧; Posterior crossbite; Orthodontic expansion treatment; Systemic review; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本篇目的是以實證醫學方式評估比較不同種類上顎擴張方式對後牙錯咬改善率是否有差異。研究選擇條件以上顎擴張治療後牙錯咬的隨機對照試驗(Randomized Controlled Trial, RCT),從Medline上搜尋72篇,共有十篇符合條件,其中五篇具較低偏差風險(Bias risk),如Martina R et al. (2012)、Petrén S et al. (2008)、Petrén S et al. (2011)、Godoy F et al. (2011)、McNally MR et al. (2005)等。結果顯示,快速上顎擴張和慢速上顎擴張在治療後牙錯咬的效果上沒有顯著差異,四環擴張器(Quad-helix)的表現較活動式擴張板(Removable expansion plate)好,混合齒列時期的後牙錯咬不會產生自發性改善。 |
英文摘要 | The purposes of this literature review were to evaluate and compare the correction rate of posterior crossbite of different kinds of maxillary expansion. The study selection criteria included RCTs involving subjects with posterior crossbite with maxillary expansion which searched from MEDLINE. The search strategy resulted in 10 articles that fitted to the inclusion criteria from 72 searched papers. Five out of ten articles have low bias risk, which are Martina R et al. (2012), Petren S et al. (2008), Petren S et al. (2011), Godoy F et al. (2011), McNally MR et al. (2005). The result showed there were no significant difference between RME and SME on treating posterior crossbite. Quad-helix showed better result than removable expansion plate. Posterior crossbites did not be spontaneously corrected during the transition into the permanent dentition. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。