查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《大乘莊嚴經論》的兩種唯識三性說模型=Two Models for the Theory of Three Natures in the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 耿晴; | 書刊名 | 臺大佛學研究 |
卷期 | 30 2015.12[民104.12] |
頁次 | 頁1-63 |
分類號 | 222.13 |
關鍵詞 | 大乘莊嚴經論; 三性說; 單層結構; 雙層結構; 辯中邊論; Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra; Theory of three natures; Single-layer model; Double-layer model; Madhyântavibhāga; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文首先檢討過去學者對於《大乘莊嚴經論》三性說的討論,然後簡述單層結構與雙層結構兩種不同的三性說模型。據此對於現存《大乘莊嚴經論》的頌文進行仔細的文本分析,主張其中包含了單層與雙層結構兩種不同的三性說模型。現存《大乘莊嚴經論》頌文〈真實品〉中隱含支持的是單層結構三性說;但〈述求品〉明白主張的則是雙層結構三性說。類似的狀況也出現在《辯中邊論》中:〈相品〉與〈真實品〉分別主張單層與雙層結構的三性說。然而本文也進一步指出,不同於某些學者的主張,雙層結構三性說並不必然蘊涵依他起性是終極清淨的、因而無需滅除。事實上,本文認為在整部現存《大乘莊嚴經論》的頌文以及散文註釋中,都找不到明確支持「終極清淨依他起性」概念的證據。最後,依據現存《大乘莊嚴經論》中存在兩種三性說模型以及《攝大乘論》對於《大乘莊嚴經論》引用之不一致的兩個線索,本文建議現存《大乘莊嚴經論》頌文應該被視為是一個多層次的文獻,其中至少包含較古老以及較新的兩個文獻層次。 |
英文摘要 | This paper begins with a criticial review of the scholarly discussions of the Theory of Three Natures (trisvabhāva-nirdeśa) in the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra. I then give a brief introduction to the two different models for the Theory of Three Natures, i.e., the single-layer vs. the double-layer model. With the distinction in mind, I carefully examine the verses in the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra and conclude that the sixth chapter implicitly supports the single-layer model whereas the eleventh chapter explicitly endorses the double-layer model. A similar situation, as I have argued, also appears in the Madhyântavibhāga (verses only): there the first chapter supports the singled-layer model but the third chapter maintains the double-layer one. Different from other scholars’ opinions, I argue that even the double-layer model does not necessarily entail that the dependent nautre is ultimately pure and hence needs not be eliminated. In fact, I argue that throughout the whole Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra (verses only) and the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra-bhāṣya the notion of “ultimately pure dependent nature” is nowhere found. Finally, based on the two clues-i.e., there are two different models for the Three of Three Natures and that the Mahāyānasaṃgraha is inconsistent when quoting from Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra-, I suggest that our current version of the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra (verses only) should be viewed as a multilayered text, consisting of older and newer strata. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。