查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 臺灣宗教界對於「多元成家」與「同性婚姻」議題的立場與論述解析
- 從「同性婚姻」到「多元家庭」--朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動
- 論我國同性戀者之權益保護
- 「新型態家庭結構之法制發展座談會」會議綜述
- 酷兒左翼「超英趕美」?「同性戀正典化」的偏執及臺灣同志運動的修復詮釋
- 伴侶制度下的伴侶財產關係
- 超越破立修辭,回歸關鍵爭議--回應何思瑩
- Global Trends in Legal Recognition of Same-sex Couples: Cohabitation Rights, Registered Partnership, Marriage, and Joint Parenting
- 姊妹「戲」牆--女同志運動學
- 臺灣同志運動的後殖民思考:論“現身”問題
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣宗教界對於「多元成家」與「同性婚姻」議題的立場與論述解析=An Analysis of Taiwanese Religious Communities' Positions on and Discussions of the Question of Diverse Families (Duoyuan Chengjia 多元成家) and Same-Sex Marriage |
---|---|
作 者 | 釋昭慧; | 書刊名 | 臺灣宗教研究 |
卷 期 | 14:2 2015.12[民104.12] |
頁 次 | 頁31-51 |
專 輯 | 臺灣宗教團體與同性戀運動 |
分類號 | 544.71 |
關鍵詞 | 同志運動; 同性婚姻; 伴侶制度; 毀家廢婚; 性別正義; LGBT movements; Same-sex marriage; Civil partnership systems; Destroy the family, and discard marriage; Huijia feihun; Gender justice; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 臺灣的同志運動(以下簡稱「同運」),具有亞洲同性戀者的「燈塔」地位。但「宗教」在此一議題上,具有舉足輕重的力量。 臺灣同運團體於 2012年推出了三項草案:婚姻平權(含同性婚姻)草案、伴侶制度草案、家屬制度草案,這三項草案呈現了臺灣多元發展的同運光譜,從溫和派的「同性婚姻」、稍基進的「伴侶制度」,到極基進的「毀家廢婚」。個中歧見,不免相互抵銷了原已屈居弱勢的同運能量。 臺灣同志運動與部分宗教團體之間,近三年來在「多元成家」與「同性婚姻」議題上,產生了強烈的爭執,此中反同運最具代表性的是守護幸福家庭行動聯盟,其成員結構以基督宗教教友為主。本文依其爭議焦點以進行跨宗教的交互參照與現象解析,進以探討臺灣宗教界回應俗世「多元性別」價值觀與相關政策主張時,相關論述與行動所產生的張力、阻力與助力。 |
英文摘要 | The Taiwanese lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (henceforth LGBT) movements have been a beacon for the gay rights movement in Asia, but religion has also played a decisive role in this issue. The Taiwanese LGBT rights groups proposed three bills in 2012: Equal Rights Marriage (hunyin pingquan 婚姻平權 ) bill, that includes same-sex marriage; a Civil Partnership system (banlü zhidu 伴侶制度 ) bill; and a: Household Institution (jiashu zhidu 家屬制度 ) bill. These three represent the diverse spectrum of LGBT development in Taiwan, from the moderate position of same sex marriage, to the slightly radical civil partnership system, to the most extreme movement “destroy the family, and discard marriage” (huijia feihun 毀家廢婚 ). The disparities among them have unavoidably mutually neutralized the LGBT campaign’s already inferior and weak capabilities. For the last three years, the relationship between LGBT campaigns and some of the religious groups in Taiwan has engendered intense disputes regarding the question of diverse families and same-sex marriage. The most representative case of an opposed movement is the Christian-based Happy Family Protection Action Alliance (Shouhu xingfu jiating xingdong lianmeng守護幸福家庭行動聯盟 ). This article takes this dispute as the focal point in order to conduct a multi-religious cross-reference and analysis of relevant circumstances, and thereby explore the related discussions and all the tensions, oppositions, and assistance created when Taiwanese religious communities respond to multi-gendered secular value systems and advocate for related policies. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。