頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 海疆劃界實踐對釣魚臺爭議的啟示=The Lessons Learned from Maritime Boundary Delimitation Cases: With Special Reference to the Settlement of the Disputes Concerning Diao-yu-tai Island |
---|---|
作 者 | 高聖惕; | 書刊名 | 中華國際法與超國界法評論 |
卷 期 | 11:1 2015.06[民104.06] |
頁 次 | 頁23-80 |
分類號 | 579.14 |
關鍵詞 | 海疆劃界; 領土爭端; 釣魚臺; 聯合國海洋法公約; 臺日漁業協定; Sea boundary delimitation; Territorial disputes; Diao-yu-tai Island; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; ROC-Japan fisheries agreement; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 中日釣魚臺領土及周邊海域的爭端,一直困擾著海峽兩岸的政府。臺日雙方經過十七年的談判,在二○一三年四月簽署臺日漁業協議,臺灣認為解決了臺日釣魚臺爭端,大陸則不以為然。從國際法的角度來看,兩岸之間所面對的釣魚臺領土主權以及海疆劃界問題,是任何一個強調「海洋政策」的國家都可能遇到的問題。海洋政策的核心在於政府對於海洋資源及海域空間,強化管理。倘若一個國家無法確定海洋法所賦予的各種海域與鄰國的疆界,則遑論在各海域當中完全地行使管轄權及管理其中的資源,更不可能和平地使用海洋當中的資源。海峽兩岸政府在東海與日本的大陸礁層與 EEZ 的劃界問題,因為釣魚臺的主權歸屬問題遲遲不能解決,使得釣魚臺周圍海域的海疆劃界談判難以進行。兩岸在南海也面臨類似障礙。本文的問題是:島嶼主權歸屬問題倘若不能解決,是否可以解決相關國家所面對的「遂行海洋政策」的「部分」問題?本文第貳部分將討論解決涉及領土爭議的海疆劃界爭端的相關國際法原則。第參及第肆部分將檢討東北亞國家如何解決此類爭端的作法,特別聚焦日本(做為釣魚臺爭端的對手國)如何處理與韓國、俄國、中國大陸的劃界爭端。第伍及陸部分則放大視野,討論東北亞以外的國家處理此類複雜爭端的作法。 |
英文摘要 | The territorial and sea boundary delimitation disputes concerning Diao-yu-tai Island have been troubling the Governments across the Taiwan Strait. After difficult negotiations for 17 years, the ROC-Japan Fisheries Agreement was finally concluded in April 2013. From Taiwan’s perspectives, this Agreement has to a certain degree settled the disputes concerning Diao-yu-tai Island. For this, the PRC Government holds a completely opposite view. In the eyes of international law, the territorial and maritime boundary delimitation issues relating to Diao-yu-tai Island facing the Governments across the Taiwan Strait are common issues that many other Governments have to tackle in order to implement their “Oceans Policies”. The essence of “Oceans Policies” is the enhancement of governance by a coastal State over its marine resources and maritime zones. For a State whose sea boundaries are disputed by its neighbouring States, it will be hard to implement ocean governance, to exercise maritime jurisdiction, and to peacefully exploit marine resources endowed by international law of the sea. The issues of maritime delimitation for the overlapping EEZ and continental shelf in the East China Sea and South China Sea are made more complicated and difficult due to the territorial disputes over Diao-yu-tai Island and those islands and maritime features lying in the South China Sea. The issues to be addressed by this paper are, under the circumstances that the territorial disputes remain unresolved, how can the maritime boundary delimitation disputes be settled so as to implement the “Oceans Policies” of the respective States? Part II of this paper will examine the relevant rules of international law concerning how to settle the maritime boundary delimitation disputes involving territorial disputes. Parts III and IV will explore how States in North East Asia have been settling such kind of complicated sea boundary delimitation disputes, with special reference to the practice of Japan in settling such kind of disputes with Russia, Korea, and PRC. Parts V and VI of this paper will look at the practices of those States beyond North East China in handling such kind of disputes. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。