查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 獨立董監之設置決策與績效
- 股票上櫃過程股權結構與經營績效變化之實證研究
- 國際合資股權結構及母公司控制程度對合資績效之影響
- International Technology Transfer Contents and Manufacturing Performance
- 本國銀行業股權結構、經營風險與績效關聯性之實證研究
- 臺灣上市公司內部股東持股質押行為與股市變動關聯性之探討
- 上市公司股權結構與經營績效之實證分析--以上海證券交易所為例
- 股權結構、資本結構與經營績效--Jensen、Meckling與Fama理論之驗證
- 臺灣地區上市公司董監事、關係人持股比率和公司托賓Q關係之研究
- 公司內部治理機制與公司績效之關係--股權結構與董事會特性的觀點
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 獨立董監之設置決策與績效=The Decision of Having Independent Members on the Board and Its Relation to Performance |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳宜伶; 林宛瑩; | 書刊名 | 管理與系統 |
卷 期 | 20:4 2013.10[民102.10] |
頁 次 | 頁697-725 |
分類號 | 494.28 |
關鍵詞 | 獨立董監; 股權結構; 公司特性; 績效; Independent board member; Ownership structure; Firm characteristic; Performance; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究從企業之股權結構與公司特性的觀點,探討設置獨立董監之決定因素及其對後續績效之影響。由於獨立董監之設置係決定於公司(董事會)設置意願與獨立董監出任的意願,本文提出獨立董監的自我選擇假說,預期獨立董監設置前績效較佳之公司,公司與獨立董監合意的機率較大,因此設置獨立董監之可能性及席次比例較高。我們發現,股權結構變數中,外部大股東持股與內部人持股高之公司,以及公司特性變數中,設置前績效表現差、電子業者、競爭程度高與公司規模大之企業,設置獨立董監之可能性與席次比率較高;控制權與盈餘分配權偏離程度高及家族控制之公司,則較低。最後,在控制設置前期間之績效表現下,在設置組中,設置前期間績效較差(佳)之樣本其後續績效顯著提升(衰退)。我們的實證發現未支持獨立董監之設置決策符合自我選擇假說,而設置獨立董監之效益則支持增進績效之論點,但僅限於設置前績效差之公司。 |
英文摘要 | This study investigates the impact of ownership structure and firm characteristics on decisions of having independent members on the corporate boards and its relation to firm performance. Since well-performed firms are usually perceived to be less risky, we propose the self-selection hypothesis predicting that better performed firms tend to have more independent members on their board. We find that firms with greater shares held by blockholders and insiders (firms with higher deviation of voting rights from cash flow rights and family-controlled firms) are significantly and positively (negatively) associated with the board independence. We also find that firms with poorer prior performance, operating in the electronic industry, facing greater market competition and larger firm size are associated with greater board independence. Finally, after controlling prior performance, we observe a more obvious improve (decline) trend in subsequent performance for boards with poor (better) prior performance and independent members. Thus the evidence does not support our self-selection hypothesis and the firms with poor prior performance and independent members have a positive effect on subsequent performance. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。