查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 洗錢犯罪與犯罪收益之定義--從United States v. Santos案看美國反洗錢法之新發展
- 日本剝奪組織犯罪不法利益規定之研究
- 「海峽兩岸犯罪問題--關於洗錢問題之探討」研討會論文之一--我國與日本毒品犯罪所得沒收、追徵制度
- A Toll to Barricade Illegal Money Flows Taiwan's Opposition to the Money-Laundering Epidemic
- 追討犯罪不法所得--沒收制度之法制建構
- 踐行沒收刑事司法互助的課題--日本立法與案例的借鏡
- 瑞士防制洗錢法制
- 從日本犯罪收益移轉防止法談金融消費者之保護
- 日本麻藥特別法--控制下交付、洗錢罪及沒收追徵制度
- 大陸反洗錢措施之介紹--關於帳戶的查詢、凍結與財產沒收
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 洗錢犯罪與犯罪收益之定義--從United States v. Santos案看美國反洗錢法之新發展="Proceeds" of Crime in Money Laundering: A New Breakthrough from U.S. v. Santos |
---|---|
作者 | 林志潔; Lin, Chih-chieh; |
期刊 | 科技法學評論 |
出版日期 | 20141200 |
卷期 | 11:2 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁次 | 頁1-40 |
分類號 | 587.73 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 洗錢; 不法所得; 收益; 沒收; 財經犯罪; Money laundering; Proceeds; Profits; Receipts; Forfeiture; |
中文摘要 | 打擊組織型的財經犯罪,為世界各國面臨的重要挑戰。由於此類犯罪往往涉及大量資金移轉,如未能阻止犯罪收益透過洗錢管道漂白,將持續給予犯罪行為人繼續犯罪的誘因,更可能資助後續犯罪的發生。為此,美國國會於1986年通過洗錢控制法,惟因「犯罪收益」一詞未經定義,而造成各級法院適用上見解分歧。一派認為收益一詞係指扣除犯罪成本後之所得,另一派則認為犯罪收益不應扣除犯罪成本方能有效阻斷不法誘因。本文藉由分析美國聯邦最高法院United States v. Santo乙案,釐清近期美國洗錢防制法制中因「犯罪收益」一詞所引發之重大爭議,並對國會後續做出之修法回應予以評述,期能藉此作為我國未來財經犯罪防制之參考。 |
英文摘要 | How to prevent and combat large-scale financial crimes has become the most critical criminal issue in many countries. To combat financial crimes, U.S. Congress passed Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, which prohibits the use of the proceeds of criminal activities for various purposes, including engaging in, and conspiring to engage in, transactions intended to promote the carrying on of unlawful activity. However, what proceeds mean was undefined in the act. Various interpretations of proceeds by the Circuits caused the disorder of law enforcement. This article analyzes the latest issue of the Money Laundering Control Act through analyzing U.S. v. Santos and the following response from the U.S. Congress, and hopes to respond to the challenges of financial crimes in the contemporary Taiwanese society. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。