查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 希臘債務危機再現
- 希臘深陷債務困境之原因及脫困之道
- 知識經濟時代的新治理模式--歐陸新治理(Modern Governance)的觀點
- 加強倫理道德為政府治理奠基
- 系統動態觀點下國家創新系統之探討
- 運用內部控制發揮政府監督、洞察及前瞻功能
- 政府內部控制之推動現況與展望
- 大數據時代的政府治理:美國馬里蘭州歐麥利州長的治理經驗
- 國家創新能耐與經濟發展之實證研究
- 書評:Terry L. Cooper (泰力.庫柏) and Donald C. Menzel (唐納.曼佐), eds., «Achieving Ethical Competency for Public Service Leadership» (實踐公共服務領導力所需的德行能力) (M.E. Sharp, Inc., 2013)
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 希臘債務危機再現=The Recurrence of the Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis |
---|---|
作 者 | 羅至美; | 書刊名 | 問題與研究 |
卷 期 | 54:3 2015.09[民104.09] |
頁 次 | 頁149-156 |
分類號 | 565.495 |
關鍵詞 | 希臘公民投票紓困案; 希臘債務危機; 債務減記; 財政撙節; 政府治理; Greece's referendum on bailout; The Greek debt crisis; Debt relief; Austerity; Governance; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 2015年7月,希臘的公民投票以61%的多數否決了歐盟的第三次紓困案,希臘主權債務危機再起。基於國際資金自2010年起已陸續處分希臘資產,其他歐債危機國家亦陸續走向經濟復甦的現實下,此次希臘債務危機對全球與歐盟經濟影響有限。希臘公投事件主要影響的是本國利益,公投為希臘換來更嚴格的紓困條件,反轉了復甦中的經濟成長,同時賠上了僅存的政府信譽與國際信任。從希臘是歐債危機國家中唯一被紓困三次、債務減少一半、獲得最多金援、五年來卻仍未有效控制危機等多項「希臘例外」的事實觀察,IMF所堅持的債務減記(debt relief)與所批評的財政撙節並非是阻礙危機解決的要件,歐盟紓困金額的規模與次數亦非是終結危機的保證,希臘政府的改革與重建才是結束危機的答案。基此,本文主張,第三次紓困方案中,歐盟對希臘政府治理與經濟主權廣泛地干預與監管,可視為希臘治理改革的轉捩點與終結危機的必要步驟。 |
英文摘要 | The EU's bailout package was vetoed by the Greek people in the referendum of July 2015. This unexpected outcome caused the recurrence of the Greek debt crisis. Since international investors have disposed their holdings on Greek assets and other crisis countries in the eurozone have been recovering from the European sovereign debt crisis, the Greek event had limited impact on the world and EU economies this time. What this referendum event has affected most was its own national interests. It not only resulted in stricter bailout conditions afterwards, reversed the recovering trend of the Greek economy, but also damaged the reputation of the Greek government and international trust. Greek is the only euro country that has been bailed out for three times, the only euro country with special treatment of debt relief of 50%, and the only euro country that has been offered the largest amount of international financing without fully controlling the crisis after 5 years. Given these "Greece-exceptions," debt relieves and austerities were not impediments to the resolution of the Greek crisis, nor would number of bailouts provide any guarantee to an end of crisis. In fact, reforms and capacity-rebuilding from the Greek administration hold the answers to crisis resolution. This paper, accordingly, argues that EU's extensive intervention in Greece's economic sovereignty and supervision of the Greek administration were the turning points of reforming its governance and the necessary steps to ending the Greek crisis. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。