查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 周公“攝政稱王”及其與儒家政治哲學的幾個問題=Zhou Gong as a Prince Regent and It’s Meaning with Some Political Philosophy Problems in Confucianism |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 劉豐; | 書刊名 | 儒教文化研究 |
| 卷 期 | 11 2009.02[民98.02] |
| 頁 次 | 頁73-95 |
| 分類號 | 094.1 |
| 關鍵詞 | 周公; 攝政稱王; 周禮; 儒家; 儒家政治哲學; Zhou Gong; A Prince Regent; Zhou li; Confucianism; Confucian Political Philosophy; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 儒家肯定的周公“攝政稱王”,不是一個簡單的歷史判斷,而是與儒家政治哲學相關的理論問題。儒家肯定周公攝政稱王,因為這是儒家素王說或王魯說的理論前提。與周公相關的《周禮》之所以能夠在後世政治中產生變革意義,就在於它是周公踐天子位後制禮作樂的產物。從圍繞王安石變法所展開的爭論中可以看到周公攝政稱王是《周禮》一書具有變革意義的理論前提。 |
| 英文摘要 | To Confucianism, it is not a historical event, but a political philosophy problem that Zhou Gong had been a prince regent. An assumption that Confucius would be a king was also based on the premise that Zhou Gong had been a prince regent. In the Confucianism context, this is the reason why Zhou li, which wad created by Zhou Gong, could play an important role in the reform in later dynasties. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。