頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論戰模式的歷史建構與國際關係理論=Historical Construction of the Debates Narrative and International Relations Theory |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 林挺生; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際研究季刊 |
卷期 | 11:3 2015.秋[民104.秋] |
頁次 | 頁107-127 |
分類號 | 578.1 |
關鍵詞 | 國際關係理論; 現實主義; 場域; 語言-行動; 科學哲學; International relations theory; Realism; Field; Speech-act; Philosophy of science; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 國際關係研究經常用一系列論戰的方式來論述其歷史,但是這樣的敘事模式充滿爭議。本文將從論戰歷史切入,採用知識社會學與思想史的方法進行分析。接著回到1954年國際政治理論研討會的記錄,探討現實主義者對學科獨立性與專有理論的看法。最後連結Waltz的結構現實主義理論,來理解關於理論的本質問題。 |
英文摘要 | International Relations study tends to narrate its history in terms of “great debates." This narrative is by no means uncontroversial. This paper will question this dominant historiography of the “debates," with the help of theories from sociology of knowledge and intellectual history. We will then turn to the founding event of the realist school in 1954, and reveal the realists' struggle for the disciplinary autonomy and a specific theory by assessing the conference transcript. Finally, the main emphasis will be on the nature of theory by linking to Waltz's structural realist theory. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。