查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Rebirth or Doom: Thematic Disputes on T. S. Eliot's 'The Waste Land'
- 詩和典故--以〈荒原〉為例
- 評The Wasted Land: A Study of T. S. Eliot's «The Waste Land»
- 艾略特和他的「荒原」
- 再談艾略特的「荒原」
- 論艾略特的「荒原」
- 舞場裡的骷髏--王墨林的劇作《荒原》
- 亂世雙城記--並讀夏濟安〈香港--一九五○〉與艾略特《荒原》
- 在荒地上發芽的嫩草:從詹冰詩看戰後初期臺灣現代主義詩的重啟時刻
- 龐德(Ezra Pound)、艾略特(T. S. Eliot)與「荒原」
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | Rebirth or Doom: Thematic Disputes on T. S. Eliot's 'The Waste Land'=重生或毀滅:艾略特「荒原」的主題爭議 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 杜敏超; | 書刊名 | 萬能學報 |
| 卷 期 | 36 2014.07[民103.07] |
| 頁 次 | 頁3-12 |
| 分類號 | 873.51 |
| 關鍵詞 | 重生; 毀滅; 艾略特; 荒原; Rebirth; Doom; Eliot; The Waste Land; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 由於文評家所採取的批評方法之不同,導致艾略特著名的長詩「荒原」之主題久經爭議。有些文評家只以文本作為評論的對象,而有些則以詩人的思想背景作為詮釋文本的依據,莫衷一是。本文以F. R. Leavis和Cleanth Brooks兩位知名的文評家對「荒原」的解讀為依據,進行主題差異的探討,以了解詩作的真義。本文認為,讀者個人在其情境下的閱讀參與,才是重要的詮釋泉源。 |
| 英文摘要 | The interpretation of T. S. Eliot's 'The Waste Land' has been widely disputed over the decades. The nature of this critical phenomenon is attributed to the difference of the critical approaches his critics take. Some stick sorely to the mere text of the poem, while others read too much off the text per se. Henceforth the issues of meta-critical problematic arise where the poem is being discussed. F. R. Leavis, for instance, tries to probe for the themes of 'The Waste Land' by way of examining the poet's intention as well as his personal intellectual background. On the other hand, Cleanth Brooks, with his formalistic stance, disagrees with Leavis on the matter in question. My reading of the poem reveals that Leavis reads way off the text itself and relies too much on the personal and social being of the poet in his interpretation, whereas Brooks, a distinguished formalist, does not truly stick to his beliefs in the interpretation of the poem. An open reading calling for the reader's personal, contextual participation may well serve a better understanding of the poem. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。