查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 大專籃球運動選手社會支持、學校適應與參與動機量表編制=The Scale Development of Social Support, School Adjustment, and Participate Motivation of College Basketball Player |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳明宏; 陳建廷; 張珈瑛; | 書刊名 | 運動休閒管理學報 |
卷 期 | 12:3 2015.09[民104.09] |
頁 次 | 頁20-32 |
分類號 | 528.952 |
關鍵詞 | 大專籃球; 社會支持; 學校適應; 參與動機; College basketball; Social support; School adjustment; Participate motivation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的旨在編製適合大專籃球選手社會支持、學校適應與參與動機之量表。研究對象為102學年度大專籃球聯賽之選手,所得資料經統計分析後,結果顯示:社會支持量表包含「家人支持」、「隊友支持」、「同學支持」、「老師支持」及「教練支持」五個構面24題,其累積解釋變異量67.53%;學校適應量表包含「同儕適應」、「學習適應」、「學業適應」以及「師生互動」四個構面共17題,其累積解釋變異量62.18%;參與動機量表包含「健康適能」、「成就需求」、「社會需求」、「刺激避免」與「技術需求」五個構面21題,其累積解釋變異量70.20%。各分量表之Cronbach's α介於.709~.936,顯示本量表具有可接受的建構效度與信度。接著採驗證性因素分析考驗量表假設模式之適配程度,社會支持量表之結果顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ^2=579、χ^2/df=3.05、GFI=0.9、SRMR=0.051、RMSEA=0.065、NNFI=0.97、CFI=0.98、PNFI=0.77、PGFI=0.68),學校適應量表之結果經修正後顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ^2=42.75、χ^2/df=3.54、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.021、RMSEA=0.070、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.54、PGFI=0.50),參與動機量表之結果經修正後顯示量表具有可接受之適配度,運動倦怠量表之結果顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ^2=56.47、χ^2/df=2.46、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.030、RMSEA=0.057、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.63、PGFI=0.50)。本量表可提供未來研究大專籃球運動研究者做為參考。 |
英文摘要 | This study is aimed at develop a college basketball player of social support, school Adjustment and participate motivation scale. Object of study is the 2013 academic year college basketball league player. Statistical analysis of the resulting data: (1) The social support scale, cumulative variance explained of 67.53 %, has five facets total of 24 questions included "family support", "teammate support", "support the students", "teacher support" and "coach support". (2) The school Adjustment scale, cumulative variance explained of 62.18 %, has four facets total of 17 questions including "peer adapt", "learning to adapt", "learning to adapt" and "teacher-student interaction". (3) The participate motivation scale, cumulative variance explained of 70.20 %, has five facets total of 21, questions including 'healthy fitness", "need for achievement", "social demand", "avoid stimulating" and "technical requirements". The Cronbach's α of subscales ranged from .709 to .936. Shows the scale has acceptable construct validity and reliability. Then using confirmatory factor analysis test the goodness of fit hypothesis model. Statistical analysis of the resulting data: (1) The social support scale results show an acceptable goodness of fit (χ2=579、χ^2/df=3.05、GFI=0.9、SRMR=0.051、RMSEA=0.065、NNFI=0.97、CFI=0.98、PNFI=0.77、PGFI=0.68). (2) The school adaptation scale (χ^2=42.75、χ^2/df=3.54、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.021、 RMSEA=0.070、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.54、PGFI=0.50). (3) The participation motivation scale result after correction exhibit acceptable goodness of fit (χ^2=56.47、χ^2/df=2.46、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.030、RMSEA=0.057、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.63、PGFI=0.50). This scale may provide researchers study college basketball as a reference in the future. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。