查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 木竹製品製造業之原料採購考慮因素與國產材認知調查分析=Analysis of Procurement Factors and Recognition of Domestic Timber Supply by Wood- and Bamboo-based Product Manufacturers in Taiwan |
---|---|
作者 | 林俊成; 陳溢宏; 林裕仁; 李金梅; | 書刊名 | 臺灣林業科學 |
卷期 | 30:2 2015.06[民104.06] |
頁次 | 頁109-119 |
分類號 | 482.8 |
關鍵詞 | 國產材; 供應來源選擇準則; 木竹製品製造業; Domestic timber; Supplier selection criteria; Wood and bamboo product manufacturing; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以台灣木竹製品製造業廠商為對象,針對其選擇料源供應考慮因素及對國產材認知及競爭力等進行問卷調查。調查結果顯示,在147份回收有效問卷的廠商中,原木、製材、單板、合板和纖維板以向進口商及代理商採購為主;木炭和粒片板則為自行採購國內原料;木片與粒片以向中間商、零售商採購原料為主。在選擇木材原料供應時,以「供應來源穩定」、「價格合理公道」、「供應數量充分」被認為是重要的因素,可見所需料源的穩定一直為廠商生產所關心;而廠商選擇使用國產材做為原料來源的原因,乃為符合產品(消費者)需求及客製化需求為主;受訪廠商普遍認為國內木材供應來源及數量嚴重不足,是推動使用國產材最大的障礙。另國內廠商對於國產材認知部分,普遍認為「國內木材供應來源及數量不足」、「國內森林禁伐天然林政策」、「國內森林有年伐採量限制」及「國內木材價格偏高」,但不認同「國內木材品質不佳」。因此,為提升國產材使用,「推動木材為綠色產品,納入政府綠色採購優先項目中」、「協助建立國產材產業鏈」、「推動木製產品生產認證」及「開發國產材之多元化利用」為廠商認為可行之策略。 |
英文摘要 | To investigate condition factors for selecting of material source supplies, recognition of domestic timber, and its competitiveness, a questionnaire was mailed to wood- and bamboo-based product manufacturers in Taiwan. The results from 147 valid respondents showed that the main purchase pathways of logs, lumber, veneer, plywood, and fiberboard were directly through importers and agents; the pathway of charcoal and particle board was self-purchased domestic raw materials, and pathways of chips were mainly by middlemen and retailers. When determining the wood raw material supply, factors of "stability of supply", "reasonable price", and "sufficient supply quantities" were important concerns. That means a stable material source is a ubiquitous concern of manufacturers. However, the main reasons that manufacturers produce items using domestic timber as material sources were to meet customers' special needs and customization. Most respondents thought that significant obstacles to promoting domestic timber use were timber supply sources and serious shortages. In addition, regarding the cognition of domestic timber, most manufacturers generally responded that "domestic timber sources and quantities are insufficient", "three are logging prohibitions on domestic old-growth forests", "annual logging amounts from domestic forests were controlled", and "domestic timber has a relatively higher price". However, they disagreed with the following statement: "the quality of domestic timber is insufficient". Therefore, to increase domestic timber use, most manufacturers considered feasible strategies such as "promoting timber as green products and connecting to governmental green priority procurement policies", "building a domestic timber industry chain", "promoting wood product certification", and "developing diverse use of domestic timber" should be done by the concerned authorities. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。