查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 專利進步性判斷之法學方法論--美、德之借鏡及臺灣實務之檢討
- 由專利法教示因果關係論專利進步性:以組合專利與類似組合專利為中心
- 發明「所屬技術領域中具有通常知識者」之確立與進步性評價--以智慧財產法院105年度行專更(一)第4號判決為中心
- 探討修改「進步性」專利要件以因應生物科技發展的必要性--以美國法為主
- 探討傳統知識受專利制度保護之可行性
- 專利法中「發明所屬技術領域中具有通常知識者」之法實證研究
- 美國專利法上化學發明之非顯而易知性研究
- 美國專利法上化學發明之非顯而易知性研究
- 論進步性審理之進步空間--智慧財產法院九十七年度行專訴字第十九號行政判決評析
- 進步性判斷之「所屬技術領域中具有通常知識者」--德國立法例之觀點
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 專利進步性判斷之法學方法論--美、德之借鏡及臺灣實務之檢討=The Legal Standard of Judging Inventive Step--Perspective from US and Germany Practice and Review on Taiwan's Court Judgments |
---|---|
作 者 | 李素華; 張哲倫; | 書刊名 | 月旦法學 |
卷 期 | 242 2015.07[民104.07] |
頁 次 | 頁227-259 |
分類號 | 440.6 |
關鍵詞 | 進步性; 通常知識者; 先前技術; 後見之明; 專利; Inventive step; Non-obviousness; Phosita; Prior art; Hindsight; Patent; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 進步性乃專利法中之不確定法律概念,其判斷涉及通常知識者之技術水準、先前技術範圍、發明與先前技術差距等諸多抽象概念之界定,乃困擾專利專責機關及法院之重要議題。相較於美歐國家已就進步性判斷建立一般性準則或問題手段準則之方法論,臺灣實務仍有相當之努力與法制建構空間。 |
英文摘要 | The issue of judging inventive step in the proceedings of both patent prosecution and litigation has been one of the most challenging tasks. It is a crucial legal issue in the patent practice in Taiwan as it is unavoidable in most of the cases. The patent law can provide little guidance to judge the issue of inventive step because of the laws abstraction nature. The practice of the US and Germany heavily rely on the methodology generated by the case law to solve the issue. Their methodology works quite well and that the methodology of the US and Germany are surprisingly similar after comparing the case law in the two regions. The intention of this article is to introduce the US and the Germany the methodology with respect to judging inventive step on the basis of its case law and use it to review the Taiwanese practice. The key point of the recommended methodology is to focus on the subjective knowledge of the skilled in the art, not like the current Taiwanese case law which pays too much attention to the objective difference between the patent and prior art references. By properly applying the subjective rule may help correct the current difficulty facing in Taiwan that over 60% invention patents asserted in the patent litigation are held to be invalid. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。