查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國外羈押制度與被告人權之研究--以美日中為例=The Comparison of Research of Detention and the Human Rights of Defendant among China, United States, Japan and Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳威志; 李岳牧; 王彥文; | 書刊名 | 通識論叢 |
卷 期 | 12 2011.12[民100.12] |
頁 次 | 頁23-58 |
分類號 | 586.514 |
關鍵詞 | 羈押; 被告人權; 基本權利; 憲法修正案; Detain; Defendant human rights; A fundamental right; Constitutional amendment; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文選擇美、日等先進國家作為本文探討研究之對象,其原因為該些國家在羈押制度及對於被告受羈押時之人權保障等方面皆有可供我國效法及學習之處。在美國為英美法系國家,對於羈押之規定散見於各判決及判例之中,更於憲法修正案中,提及被告人權之保障,顯見美國對於被告人權之保障有領先世界各國之處,本文將略述介紹美國之羈押制度,並對現行美國實務之態度及對羈押被告於受羈押時美國法律如何保障其權利等,提出論述;又日本法與我國法制皆為大陸法系,我國有許多法律承襲及繼受日本法,受其影響至深,不言可喻,本文將介紹日本對於羈押制度,在偵查中與審判中的處置與態度,與我國有何差異及何處為可供我國學習、改進之處。鑒於兩岸交流日益頻繁,兩岸人民對於彼此之法制皆應具備一定之認識,故本文特別介紹中國大陸現行刑事訴訟法中有關於羈押之制度。參考美國、日本及中國大陸有關各該國家所規定羈押法制之相關政策及立法,並分析其中之利弊得失,進而與我國刑事訴訟法中之羈押措施與我國羈押法之相互比較,更於各該國家有關於對羈押被告人權之保障與我國不同之處或是有可供我國學習與檢討改進之處;希望由以上三個國家的羈押法制對比我國羈押法制,探討我國在修正相關法律規範時,如何參酌外國之立法經驗,並配合我國之實務運作之情形,作一合理且適當的修正,並可檢視我國目前實務上之作法與現行之規定是否足以達到維護羈押被告人權保障之憲法上權益。 |
英文摘要 | This article focuses on the regulation of detention of two advanced countries, United States and Japan, as the object of study; the reasons are that the systems of detention and the protection of human rights of defendant of these two countries could be an example of our country to follow. United States as a Common Law System country, the regulation of detention can usually be seen in the verdict and legal precedent; the protection of human rights of defendant is further mentioned in the constitutional amendment. In which case can obviously tell that when it comes to the human rights, United States is being ahead of other nations in the world. This article will discuss the system of detention of United States and proposes the elaboration that the position of US laws in practice and how the US laws protect the human rights of defendant. Further, the law systems in Japan and Taiwan are Civil Law System; the law systems in Taiwan are deeply influenced and adopted by Japanese laws. This article will discuss the difference of laws between Taiwan and Japan, also the positions of laws when comes to investigate and trial and whether the regulations of ours should be adjusted or followed the Japanese laws. In the view of fact that the interaction between Taiwan and China become more frequently, people from both sides should have basic concepts of each other’s legal systems. As a result, this article will also discuss the present regulation of detention in the code of criminal procedure in China. Refer to the regulation of detention in the code of criminal procedure among United States, Japan and China, this article will analyze its merits and demerits; further the regulation of these three countries will be compared to the regulation of detention in Taiwan and then discuss the difference and the improvement of the regulation in our country. By comparing the regulation of detention of these three countries with the regulations in Taiwan, it is hoped to deliberate on the experiences of legislation of these three countries and match the situation in practice in our country when amending the related regulation; to view that whether the present regulation of detention of our country is protecting the human rights of defendant. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。