查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 基因改造魚對人體及自然環境的影響及其因應=The Reformation of Law and Regulation on Transgenic Fish |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡達智; | 書刊名 | 世新法學 |
卷期 | 8:2 2015.06[民104.06] |
頁次 | 頁353-383 |
分類號 | 412.25 |
關鍵詞 | 基因轉殖; 基改魚; 生命科技; 行政管制; 食品安全; 預防原則; 風險控管; GMO; Transgenic fish; Biotechnology; Administrative regulation; Food safety; Precaution; Risk assessment; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 就基因改造魚的發展沿革及其可能引來的環境危害風險以及食品安全問題,美國認為基因改造觀賞魚已無明顯重大的環境風險,並未嚴格禁止基改魚釋放野外自然環境,甚至可以自由交易基改觀賞魚,不論是否釋放自然環境,食用基改鮭魚也一樣認為在自然環境中無明顯重大環境危害。截至目前為止,食用基改魚雖未完成食品上市審查許可,但類推基改植物食品發展數十年的經驗,基改魚食品在風險控管與實驗多年之後,假如沒有不可承受的環境與安全風險,既有的管制政策及其手段,即已充分,無須另設特別管制程序。 |
英文摘要 | From the legal views on transgenic fish, people who propose this new technology and industry had won the battle at the first ground while the conservative party successfully stepped into halt the approval process for human consumption. The existing imperfect or default regulations on transgenic fish, no matter how the negative impacts on human health or the environment, almost set a free trade market to support the research or industrialization of GMO fish. As a leading country to the rest of the world, the United States open the free market for the fluorescent ornamental transgenic fish without any further concerned the negative risks of the environment. So as the same judgments for releasing transgenic salmons into the wild natural based on the reasons of absence of evidence to have clear and important negative environmental risks. As a result, all the transgenic plants and animals into a laissez-faire market that leading people have been changed their life style forever. Whether it is right or not, it should have fair and equal review at this issue thoroughly after several generations past. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。