查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Connection between Golf Skill and Tournament Performance=高爾夫揮桿技能與比賽表現相關性分析 |
---|---|
作 者 | 梁俊煌; 施正人; 王明瑞; | 書刊名 | 休閒運動健康評論 |
卷 期 | 3:1 2011.12[民100.12] |
頁 次 | 頁44-57 |
分類號 | 993.5 |
關鍵詞 | 高爾夫球; 揮桿技能; Driving distance; Greens in regulation percentage; Scrambling; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要是希望暸解2010年PGA高爾夫選手揮桿技能與比賽表現相關性分析。研究自變相計有高爾夫技能如開球距離、開球準確度、攻上果嶺機率、果嶺邊回救能力等,依變相則有選手比賽成績如1 最後一回合成績、2.擊出低標準桿機率、3.四桿洞成績、4.上果嶺博蒂機率、5.每回合成績、6.四桿洞博蒂機率、7.五桿洞成績、8.三桿洞成績、9.第三回合成績、10.老鷹(回合數)、11.博蒂機率、12.五桿洞博蒂機率等。研究中以線性多元迴歸進行選手擊球技能與比賽成績表現相關性分析,α= .05 為顯著考驗水準。結果:1.開球距離分別與擊出低標準桿機率(t = 3.940, p < .01)、五桿洞成績(t = 2.589, p < .05)、及三桿洞成績(t = 3.627, p < .01)呈正相關。2.開球距離卻與四桿洞博蒂機率(t = -3.169, p < .01)、及老鷹(t =-2.291, p < .05)呈現負相關。3.開球準確度與四桿洞博蒂機率呈正相關(t = 2.110, p < .05)。5.攻上果嶺機率與擊出低標準桿機率(t = 7.006, p < .01), 及老鷹(t = 2.964, p < .01)呈正相關。5.攻上果嶺機率與上果嶺博蒂機率呈負相關(t = -11.610, p < .01)。6. 果嶺邊回救能力分別與四桿洞成績(t = -2.466, p < .05)及四桿洞博蒂機率(t = -2.466, p < .05), and Par 4 Birdie%(t = -3.097, p < .01). 7)呈負相關。7. 果嶺邊回救能力與上果嶺博蒂機率呈正相關(t = 2.021, p < .05)。建議:綜合上述所得結果,為讓選手成績更好,教練可增加選手肌力與力量訓練,以利提升選手擊球距離。同時、強化選手解決問題能力、心理強悍度、提高選手擊球控制能力,增加擊球精準度。如此定能讓選手擊出更好的成績。 |
英文摘要 | This study was designed to determine the correlation between golf swing and 2010 PGA Tour performance. Golf skills were defined asindependent variables, which were assessed swing performance: Driving Distance, Driving Accuracy, Greens in Regulation Percentage (GIRP), and Scrambling. The dependent variables were recorded by Tour performance such as 1.Scoring Average Final Round (SAFR), 2. Par Breakers, 3. Par 4 Performance, 4. Birdie Conversion %, 5. Scoring Average, 6. Par 4 Birdie %, 7. Par 5 Performance, 8. Par 3 Performance, 9. Scoring Average 3rd Round (SA3R), 10. Eagles, 11. Birdie Average, 12. Par 5 Birdie Percentage (P5BP). The SPSS Regression was used to determine the correlation between the dependant and independent variables. The .05 level of significant will be used for all Regression. Results:(1)The Regression indicated that Driving Distance revealed significant positive linear relationship with Par Breakers (t = 3.940, p < .01), Par 5 Performance (t = 2.589, p < .05), and Par 3 Performance (t = 3.627, p < .01). (2)Driving Distance showed significant negative linear relationship with Par 4 Birdie % (t = -3.169, p < .01), and Eagles (t = -2.291, p < .05). (3) Driving Accuracy indicated significant positive linear correlation with Par 4 Birdie % (t = 2.110, p < .05). 4) GIRP demonstrated significant positive linear relationship with Par Breaker (t = 7.006, p < .01), and Eagles (t = 2.964, p < .01) 5) GIRP indicated negative linear connection with Birdie Conversion % (t = -11.610, p < .01). 6). Scrambling revealed negative linear correlation with Par 4 Performance (t = -2.466, p < .05), and Par 4 Birdie % (t = -3.097, p < .01). 7). Scrambling indicated a positive linear relationship with Birdie Conversion % (t = 2.021, p < .05). Recommendations: Golf coaches, in order to increase players’ golf performance, should encourage their players to strengthen their driving distance, driving accuracy, ball controlling ability, muscle strength, physically fitness, mental toughness, and teach them how to solve problems. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。