查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 土壤污染行為人整治責任概括繼受之法律問題--以德國法之比較為中心
- 土壤污染行為人責任之繼受與法律溯及適用--簡評大法官釋字第714號解釋
- 干涉行政法上整治責任之繼受及界限--以「土壤及地下水污染整治法」為範圍:兼評高雄高等行政法院九十三年度訴字第九四一號判決
- 再論民法上狀態責任與行為責任的區分--從功能法的角度看兩者在公私法體系中的定位
- 污染之行為責任與狀態責任
- 行政罰責任概念與責任類型暨責任競合問題之探討
- 危害防止措施行使的合法性--兼論最高行政法院101年度判字第58號判決
- 行政罰責任人之競合與裁罰順序--以公同共有土地違法使用之處罰為例
- 危害防止法上責任繼受與成本分擔
- 建築法上義務人之類型與具體義務人之判定:行政法上行為責任與狀態責任問題系絡的一個切面分析
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 土壤污染行為人整治責任概括繼受之法律問題--以德國法之比較為中心=Legal Issues of Soil Polluter's Remediation Liability Succession: In Comparison to German Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 林昱梅; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷期 | 26:3 2015.01[民104.01] |
頁次 | 頁41-97 |
分類號 | 445.6 |
關鍵詞 | 土壤污染; 整治責任; 肇事者原則; 污染行為人; 潛在污染責任人; 行為責任; 狀態責任; 概括繼受; 法律溯及既往; 釋字第714號解釋; Soil contamination; Remediation liability; Polluter-pays principle; Polluter; Person potentially responsible for pollution; Behavior liability; State liability; General succession; Retroactivity of laws; Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 714; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 司法院釋字第714號解釋宣告我國2000年制定之土壤及地下水污染整治法第48條規定,未牴觸法律不溯及既往原則及比例原則。該條係規定土壤及地下水污染整治法之特定條文,於該法施行前已發生土壤或地下水污染之污染行為人適用之。本文擬分析與該號解釋有關之土壤污染行為人整治責任之概括繼受問題。首先介紹德國警察法之行為責任與狀態責任、責任之概括繼受、德國土壤污染整治責任之相關規定,及德國行政法院裁判之見解。再就我國土壤及地下水污染整治法之整治責任規定、概括繼受,及2000年土污法第48條規定是否違反法律不溯及既往原則加以探討,最後就司法院釋字第714號解釋相關內容加以評析。 |
英文摘要 | Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 714 declared that Article 48 of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act 2000(the Act) did not violate the principle of non-retroactivity of laws and the principle of proportionality. Art 48 of the Act states that: "Articles 7, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 32, 36, 38 and 41 of the Act shall apply to the liability of polluters causing soil or groundwater pollution that has occurred prior to the effective date of this Act." This Article will focus on the legal issues of soil polluter's remediation liability succession. First, it introduces the behavior liability and state liability in Germen police law, general succession of liability, soil contamination liability in germen law and the decisions of Germen administrative courts. Second, it explores the liabilities under Taiwan Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act. Then it discusses the general succession of liability and retroactive application of the regulations in related to polluter liability. Finally, this Article will make a comment on the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 714. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。