查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 從「全有全無」到「或多或少」--以德國保險契約法上約定行為義務法制之改革為中心
- 道路交通安全規則與侵權行為法
- 英日保險詐欺索賠法制比較研究--兼評我國保險法相關建議修正條文
- 繼續性供給契約與終止權之發生/最高院100臺上675判決
- 告知義務因果關係不存在抗辯與保險契約效力
- 告知義務不實說明與保險事故間之因果關係--最高法院104年度臺上字第844號判決
- 侵權行為過失責任之體系與一般要件
- 健康保險中違反告知義務之解除權、因果關係與業務員代填要保書之效果/臺中高分院九九保險上易八[裁判簡評]
- 民事損害賠償責任成立要件上之因果關係、違法性與過失之內涵及其相互間之關係
- 英國保險法上擔保條款之變革--由效率邁向公平之路
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從「全有全無」到「或多或少」--以德國保險契約法上約定行為義務法制之改革為中心=From "All-or-nothing" to "More-or-less": Reform of Regulation on Contractual Obligations in German Insurance Contract Act |
---|---|
作 者 | 葉啟洲; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷期 | 140 2015.03[民104.03] |
頁次 | 頁223-286 |
分類號 | 587.5 |
關鍵詞 | 全有全無原則; 行為義務; 因果關係; 解除權; 終止權; 除外危險; 損害防阻; 特約條款; All-or-nothing principal; Contractual obligation; Causation; Rescind; Exclusions; Loss prevention; Special provision; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在保險關係中,保險人經常以條款約定要保人負有說明、協力或採取避免危險發生的特定行為義務。基於對價平衡原則與誠信原則,課予要保人適當的行為義務,固屬妥當。但保險條款中約定的義務違反效果,經常使得保險人得以免責或解除契約,進而使要保人或被保險人喪失全部保障,有過於嚴苛之嫌。此時除了由法院對保險條款公平性進行內容控制之外,主要的規制方法為在保險法上就約定行為義務的要件或違反效果,設立強制性的規範,以提供要保人及被保險人最低限度的保障。德國舊保險契約法雖禁止保險人解除契約,但仍以「全有全無原則」作為規範基礎,要保人或被保險人若非獲得全額的保險給付,就是保險人完全免責。二○○八年新法則揚棄了此一原則,改採酌減給付之原則,對於要保人與被保險人的權益保障有顯著的提升。類似的問題在我國若依「特約條款」的規定,保險人亦得解除契約而不負責任,要保人或被保險人之地位較德國修法前之情況更為不利,顯有改善之空間。本文擬以德國法的修正與其實施經驗為主要研究課題,進而從比較法的觀點提出我國法將來可能的修正方向。 |
英文摘要 | In insurance relation, it is a commam senerio that the insurer apply special provision to impose the duty of disclosure, collaboration and loss prevention obligations on the insured. It is reasonable to impose these obligations based on the principle of equivalence and utmost good faith on the insured. Conversely, the consequence of violating the provision by losing all the coverage might be too harsh for the policyholder. In other words, the insurer would be completely exempt or has the right to rescind the contract. Apart from filing the lawsuit to claim a term void, the most proficient way is to offer the insured a minimum protection, by establishing a compulsory regulation on breaching effect and the conduct requirements in the insurance law. The old German insurance law had banned the insurer to rescind the contract, however, the old regulation still consider all or nothing as an essence principle; Briefly, the insured will either get the full compensation or nothing. In 2008, the new insurance law amended all or nothing principle and adopted the more or less principle for the sake of the consumer protection. Similar problems in Taiwan will be a different story, due to the special provisions (Taiwan insurance law article 66 to 69), if the insured violate the provision, the insurer can rescind the contract and negated the obligation. Need less to say, the Taiwanese policyholder is in a comparatively adverse condition. This essay will focuses on the German amendment law and the practical experiences to provide the overall perspective for future reference. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。