查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 從實驗室引發的攻擊情境來探討青少年暴力行為
- 大眾傳播媒體對青少年暴力行為的影響
- Sozialisationstheoretische Ansatze und Methoden der Qualitativen Biographieforschung fur den Forschungsgegenstand: Jugendgewalt in China
- 暴力被害人特質之文獻探討
- 暴力行為的探討
- 臺北市國中生之暴力行為與溝通技巧的關係
- 狂飆少年--青少年暴力行為探討
- Age-Varying Effects of Negative Relations with Parents, School, and Peers on the Initiation of American Adolescent Violent Behavior as a Dynamic Analysis
- 潛藏轉移模式在社會學縱貫研究之應用:以青少年暴力行為發展研究為例
- 學業低成就與青少年暴力行為關係之探討
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從實驗室引發的攻擊情境來探討青少年暴力行為=Understanding Adolescent Aggressive Behavior: Clues from the Brain's Response to Laboratory-Induced Aggression |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳巧雲; 邱重儒; | 書刊名 | 青少年犯罪防治研究期刊 |
卷 期 | 6:2 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁 次 | 頁53-80 |
分類號 | 548.547 |
關鍵詞 | 青少年; 暴力行為; 暴力犯罪; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 暴力犯罪對社會所造成的傷害與危險是不容小覷的,暴力行為的發生可能是跟抑制控制歷程出現問題有關。為了瞭解攻擊行為的背後成因,本研究結合泰勒攻擊行為作業(Taylor aggression paradigm, TAP)與腦波儀,設計出引發攻擊的情境及情緒反應,目的是想從有實驗室設計的社會脈絡中,藉由操控「輸贏的比例」以及「懲罰的高低」,來瞭解暴力青少年與一般少年在抑制控制及情緒衝突監控上的差異,同時使用反應型-主動型攻擊行為問卷及巴氏衝動性量表問卷來測量受試者的攻擊行為型態及衝動性程度。本研究的對象包括衝動型暴力犯罪青少年(實驗組)、非暴力犯罪青少年(對照組1)以及一般青少年(對照組2)。反應性-主動性攻擊行為問卷及巴氏衝動性量表的結果顯示,實驗組的分數皆顯著高於對照組。泰勒攻擊行為作業的行為結果發現,實驗組給對手懲罰的分數顯著高於對照組1以及對照組2。在進行作業時的第一次試驗,即未有對手挑釁的情境下,實驗組給對手懲罰的分數亦顯著高於對照組1以及對照組2。分析各組在給予對手懲罰分數的比例,實驗組給高分懲罰(5-8分)的比例顯著高於兩對照組,實驗組給低分(1-4分)的比例顯著低於二對照組。這說明暴力青少年在解決認知以及情緒上的衝突,或是評估社會情境來調控抑制的能力較一般人弱。 |
英文摘要 | Violent offenses often cause very serious problems and dangers to society. This type of behavior is often ascribed to problems with the processes involved in inhibitory control. In this study, a Taylor Aggression Task was used to examine the effects of aggressive situations and emotions on inhibitory control in adolescents who show reactive aggression. The experiment was designed with a manipulation of the proportion of win and loses and the degree of punishment in order to try to produce a social context in the laboratory. The Reactive Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPAQ) and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) were used to measure the subjects' aggression types and their degree of impulsive behavior. The participants included impulsive violent adolescent offenders (experimental group), non-violent adolescent offenders (control group 1) and normal adolescents (control group 2). The RPAQ and BIS showed that the scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of control groups. The behavioral data from the Taylor Aggression Task showed that the experimental group gave more punishment than did control groups 1 and 2. The punishment score for the first trial, which involved no provocation, was higher for the experimental group than for the controls. Analyzing the proportion of punishment scores, the percentage of high punishment scores (score 5-8) in the experimental group was larger than in the two control groups while the reverse was true for the low punishment scores. The violent adolescents may have a deficit in solving cognitive and emotional conflict and in evaluating social context for the modification of inhibitory control. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。