頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 政策環評於碳捕集與封存之適用:英國實踐對我國的啟示=The Application of Strategic Environmental Assessment on Carbon Capture and Storage: Implication of the UK's Practice for Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳世杰; | 書刊名 | 淡江國際與區域研究 |
卷 期 | 2:1 2013.06[民102.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-40 |
分類號 | 445.9、445.9 |
關鍵詞 | 碳捕集與封存; 政策環評; 政策環評報告; 政策評估說明書; 歐盟政策環評指令; Carbon capture and storage; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental report; SEA directive; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在以英國淨煤推動架構政策環評為例,透過法例比較分析方法,探索我國目前政策環評法規適用碳捕集與封存的問題,重點有三:一、如須實施政策環評,應由何機關提出?二、在不修法前提下,現行法規能否完整涵蓋政策環評所碰觸議題;若有不足,如何修正?三、如何強化對政策環評的專業與公眾諮詢?研究認為,碳捕集與封存技術所具有的能源政策屬性,以及更廣泛的能源安全與產業政策意涵,未來我國應以能源機關作為研提機關,儘早提出推動碳捕集與封存的措施架構,進而針對該措施據以進行政策環評;其次,就碳捕集與封存此一新領域措施,我國現行政策環評規範在適用上仍有不足,不修法前提下,環境主管機關宜修正相關行政命令,俾憑進行;此外,碳捕集與封存技術仍具有相當的不確定性,推動時將引起社會更大關注,因此居成敗重大關鍵的溝通諮詢至為重要,而英國在這一方面的強化作法,對我國具有相當的參考價值。 |
英文摘要 | Drawing the case of the UK's practice in strategic environment assessment (SEA)on the framework for the development of clean coal, this article is to explore, by comparative legal analytical approach, the questions to be arisen from the applicability of Taiwan's current SEA regulations on carbon capture and storage (CCS). It focuses on one questionnaire, i.e., if there will be a requirement for the SEA application on CCS, which governmental agency should be subject to submit the environmental report? On the premise of no amendment to any laws in force, could existing regulations fully regulate related issues? If not, how to bridge the legal gap? How to strengthen the consultations among relevant authorities/bodies and the public to make the SEA report complete and the CCS deployment measures more convincing? Given the fact that CCS technology is of energy policy substance and implicates more comprehensive energy security and industrial policy, the author suggests that the energy regulator put forth a Taiwanese-versioned framework for the development of CCS, and an SEA report shall be submitted on that framework by the energy regulator. It is also thought by the author that existing SEA regulations fall short of covering all related issues on CCS SEA and shall be further amended by central environmental agency. Certainly uncertainty still exists for CCS technology and would cause more public concern for its safety that manifests the importance of consultation. However, the UK's practice exemplifying how to strengthen it would serve as good footsteps for Taiwan to follow in. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。