查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 莫特曼「彌賽亞基督論」的猶太性關注之神學意涵
- Imaginary Time in Theological Perspective: A Theological Reflection on Hawking's No-boundary Proposal
- 莫特曼的空間
- 盼望詮釋學與善之理念:一種莫特曼神學與柏拉圖哲學之對話嘗試
- 莫特曼神學思想中終末論的將來與永恆
- 科學與智慧--專訪神學家莫特曼[Jurgen Moltmann]
- 新天新地新神學
- 基督信仰的反/非邏各斯中心主義
- 讀莫特曼彌賽亞式教會論後的反思
- Hope in Theology and Philosophy: A Conversation between Jürgen Moltmann and Ernst Bloch
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 莫特曼「彌賽亞基督論」的猶太性關注之神學意涵=The Theological Significance of Jewishness Motif in J. Moltmann's Messianic Christology |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳世冠; | 書刊名 | 華神期刊 |
卷期 | 6 2014.11[民103.11] |
頁次 | 頁87-114 |
分類號 | 242 |
關鍵詞 | 莫特曼; 彌賽亞基督論; 猶太性; 神學; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | Christology in western tradition has increasingly been accused of its inclination to a Hellenistic reading of Jesus Christ. Such criticism, which involves various issues, namely, the early church debate on the two-nature of Christ, the transition of OT theology to NT theology and its cultural tradition, and anti-Semitism in church history, reflects the direct or indirect negligence of the Judaic element in Christianity. In the tradition of western theology, any issues related to "Jewishness" would without exception fall into the area of ecclesiological discussion. It was the genius of Moltmann who saw Christology, not ecclesiology, as the fundamental concern of this historically complex issue. For this, he determined to make "Messianic Christology" as the frame by which to construct his third volume of Systematic Theology series, The Way of Jesus Christ, to point out that the Christ motif comprises historical progression and eschatological perspective, through which he attempted to paint a picture of mutually dependent theological prospect between the Jews and Christians, and from which he reflects deeply the potential deficiency and the possibility of opening new paths. This article first explains the Judaic background of Moltmann's concerns, followed by an analysis of the structure and content of The Way of Jesus Christ. Finally, it points out how Moltmann's Christology opens up a theological dialogue between Jewish and Christian communities. He claims that Protestant Christology lacks eschatological nature, while its eschatological perspective is confined by an inflated soteriology. On the other hand, he believes that Jewish eschatology suppresses salvific idea, and as a result, its Messianism could not accommodate Christology. Lastly, he expects the construct of Protestant Christology to be based on the appeal of the principle of faith, love and hope. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。