查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Is There a God?--An Examination of Anselm's Ontological Proof of God's Existence with Kant's Refutation
- 回到巴門尼德--對安瑟爾謨的「上帝存在」證明的重新解讀
- 康德道德哲學對中小學道德教育的啟示
- 不能選擇的父母與孩子--讀[張友漁]《我的爸爸是流氓》
- 對「相」或範疇的純粹推演--柏拉圖〈巴門尼德篇〉第二部分之研究
- 存心倫理學、形式倫理學與自律倫理學
- 論墮胎--一個由充足理由律和道德形上學觀點的分析
- 否定性與絕對倫理--由黑格爾之自然法論文談現代社會之危機
- 犯罪階層體系方法論探源
- 費希特的康德詮釋與先驗哲學體系的出發點
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Is There a God?--An Examination of Anselm's Ontological Proof of God's Existence with Kant's Refutation=有一位神嗎?--對安瑟倫神存在的本體論證明及康得的批駁的考察 |
---|---|
作者 | 成靜; Cheng, Jing; |
期刊 | 宗教哲學 |
出版日期 | 20141200 |
卷期 | 70 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁次 | 頁127-149 |
分類號 | 164 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 神的存在; 本體論證明; 是; 安瑟倫; 康德; God's existence; Ontological proof; Being; Anselm; Kant; |
中文摘要 | 康德否定了安瑟倫關於神存在的本體論證明的有效性,因為他認為“是”不是一個謂詞,只是一個係詞。可是普蘭丁格提出“是”是一個謂詞,只是這個謂詞比較特殊;它不能單獨做謂詞,而總是要和別的謂詞一道被使用。本文要論證的是,即使“是”是一個謂詞,由於它的特殊性,安瑟倫的本體論證明仍然不能成立。本文進一步提出一個嘗試性的論證以說明此類關於神存在的本體論證明不可能。其謬誤歸根結底在於它把(作為萬有之基礎的)神當作了一個存在於世界之中的客體。 |
英文摘要 | Kant refuted Anselm's ontological proof of God's existence by claiming that "being" is not a predicative word but only a link verb. Yet Alvin Plangtinga wants to say that "being" is a predicative word, though a special one. Unlike other predicative word, this one cannot predicate by itself but always has to have another predicate going along with itself. This article would like to argue that even if "being" is a predicative word, just because it is that kind of "special" predicative word as Plantinga has pointed out, Anselm's ontological proof of God's existence cannot stand. Further, an attempting effort is made to provide a proof that this kind of "proof of God's existence" is impossible. Its ultimate mistake lies in its treating God in line with other objects that exist in this world. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。