查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 祀靈之物:史前靜浦文化與現生阿美族祭壺器研究之評析=An Object for Making Offerings to the Spirit: An Analysis of Research on the Sacrificial Pot of Prehistoric Jingpu Culture and among Contempprary Amis People |
---|---|
作 者 | 鍾國風; | 書刊名 | 民族學界 |
卷 期 | 34 2014.10[民103.10] |
頁 次 | 頁263-300 |
分類號 | 536.337 |
關鍵詞 | 靜浦文化; 阿美文化; 阿美族; 祭壺器社會生命史; Jingpu culture; Amis culture; Amis; Diwas; Social life of sacrificial pot; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 宗教禮儀性人工製品向為考古學研究核心,長期以往台灣考古學界針對花東海 岸金屬器時期晚階段考古材料中的小型陶壺,類比阿美族民族誌所載祭祀陶壺 diwas,可謂從類型學觀點標誌diwas 類別祭壺器,成為往後考古學家勾連考古學 靜浦文化(阿美文化)與阿美族之間的族群標誌物。然而,此考古材料與阿美族民 族誌所載物質文化間的直接類比,涉及兩造間意義訊息的複雜與不完整性,導致考 古材料的埋藏與分類的解釋效度。 本文於此概念下進行靜浦文化與阿美族祭壺器研究之評析,首先回顧台灣考古 學家如何透過考古材料類比阿美族陶器與diwas 祭壺器,建構與詮釋考古學靜浦文 化。第二,耙梳歷史民族誌材料,說明民族學者於長時段歷史情境紀錄阿美族祭壺 器所承載的訊息或意義認知狀態的不完整性。最後於文末提出「阿美族東昌村祭壺 器社會生命史的民族考古學」研究途徑,做為此一主題性研究的後續發展方向,涉 及阿美族人對於祭壺器的分類認知、生活實踐與埋藏的形成脈絡。 |
英文摘要 | Ritual artifacts have been central to archaeological studies. Taiwanese archaeologists have long considered the small pots which belong to the late Metal archaeological materials of Taiwan’s East Coast, as analogous to the sacrificial pot diwas recorded in Amis ethnographies, marking the pots as a diwas type of sacrificial pot from a typological perspective. This type of sacrificial pot has become an ethnic symbol to correlate Jingpu culture (Amis culture) and the Amis people in the eyes of the archaeologists. However, the direct analogy between the archaeological materials and the material culture in Amis ethnographies is flawed in its interpretation of buried objects and classification of archaeological materials, as the meanings and information on both sides are complex and incomplete. This article examines and analyzes the sacrificial pots of Jingpu culture and Amis people on the basis of the above observation. The article starts from a literature review of how Taiwanese archaeologists have analogized Amis earthenware with sacrificial pot diwas through archaeological materials to construct and interpret Jingpu culture. In the second stage, the article gives a review on past ethnographies and elaborates on the incomplete state of information and meanings borne by Amis sacrificial pots in ethnologists’ records. Finally, the article proposes an “ethnoarchaeological study on the social life of sacrificial pots in Amis Dongchang village” as a potential approach for subsequent research on this topic. This approach deals with Amis people’s classification practices, daily practice, and the buried formation processes of sacrificial pot. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。