頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從TRIMs對中國大陸外資政策帶來之轉變探討對中國-東協自由貿易區投資法制建立之影響=The Study of the Influence on the Establishment of the Investment Legal Regime between ASEAN and China in the Free Trade Area after China's Accession to WTO Based on China's Foreign Policy Changes Brought by TRIMs |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡美儀; | 書刊名 | 中華國際法與超國界法評論 |
卷 期 | 10:2 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁 次 | 頁141-176 |
分類號 | 563.52 |
關鍵詞 | 中國-東協全面經濟合作架構協議投資協議; 中國-東協自由貿易區; 雙邊投資協議; 中國外資政策; 國民待遇; 透明化要求; WTO; TRIMs; The Agreement on Investment of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the People's Republic of China; China-ASEAN Free Trade Area; Bilateral investment agreements; China's foreign policy; National treatment; Transparency requirements; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 中國大陸與東協各國於一九八○年代起便以締結雙邊投資協議來強化雙方間之投資保護,直至二○○一年為止,中國大陸已與東協十國分別締結雙邊投資協議,二○○九年中國大陸與東協簽署《中國-東協全面經濟合作架構協議投資協議》,作為規制中國-東協自由貿易區投資活動之重要骨幹,然而,比較過去中國大陸與東協各國所簽署之雙邊投資協議可發現,《中國-東協全面經濟合作架構協議投資協議》不僅擁有較多的條文數,在規範內容上亦囊括過去雙邊投資協議所沒有之範疇,其中,中國大陸加入 WTO 與否,更成為協議中是否包含國民待遇條款之分野,故本研究係以中國大陸加入 WTO 前後之外資政策轉變作為切入角度,並比較《中國-東協全面經濟合作架構協議投資協議》與過去中國大陸和東協各國所簽署之雙邊投資協議,佐以中國大陸與非東協國家所簽署之雙邊投資協議之分析,探討 TRIMs 對中國大陸外資政策帶來之轉變在中國-東協自由貿易區投資法制建立上之影響。 |
英文摘要 | Since the 1980s, China and ASEAN countries had concluded bilateral investment agreements to strengthen the investment protection between two sides. Until 2001, China had concluded bilateral investment agreements with ten countries of ASEAN. In 2009, China and ASEAN signed “The Agreement on Investment of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the People’s Republic of China” as the important regulation key of the investment activities in the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area. However, compared with the bilateral investment agreements signed by China and ASEAN countries in the past, it can be found that the ACFTA Investment Agreement has not only a larger number of provisions but also the categories which had not been included in the past bilateral investment agreements on the normative content. And whether investment agreements contained national treatment clause or not was determined by the timing that China became WTO member state. Therefore, this study will base on the foreign policy changes brought by TRIMs, the comparison of differences between ACFTA investment agreement and the bilateral investment agreements signed by China and ASEAN countries in the past, and the analysis of bilateral investment agreements signed by China and non-ASEAN countries to discuss the influence on establishment of ACFTA investment legal regime after China joined the WTO. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。