查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 作為平等的正義:德沃金平等自由主義的理路與辯護=Justice as Equality: A Defense of Ronald Dworkin's Egalitarian Liberalism |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳閔翔; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
卷 期 | 51 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁 次 | 頁93-138 |
分類號 | 541.6 |
關鍵詞 | 作為平等的正義; 分配正義; 平等自由主義; 平等關懷與尊重; 資源平等; 自由; 政治社群; Justice as equality; Distributive justice; Egalitarian liberalism; Equal concern and respect; Equality of resources; Liberty; Political community; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在從德沃金平等自由主義的內在理路來探討其分配正義觀點,進而導出「作為平等的正義」(justice as equality)結論並為之辯 護。本文的主要論點認為,德沃金的自由主義,不僅把自由、平等與社群整合起來,同時藉由資源平等的制度設計-它要求把平等與責任置於同樣重要的地位,落實了「作為平等的正義」理論目標。據此,本文從德沃金平等原則基本論旨出發,依次檢視了「平等關懷與尊重」及「倫理個人主義的平等原則」論點,接著考察德沃金「資源平等」的正義制度設計,包括探討他如何論證資源平等優於福利平 等、假設性保險市場的論述,以及「敏於志向、鈍於稟賦」的正義理念。最後則針對「自由與平等是否衝突」、「自由主義能否形成政治社群」這些重要問題,為德沃金「作為平等的正義」理論進行反思與辯護。 |
英文摘要 | In this article, the author tries to clarify "justice as equality" by exploring what distributive justice Ronald Dworkin illustrated egalitarian liberalism. I argue that he has not only integrated liberty, equality, and community into his liberalism but has also justified a principle of justice, that is, justice as equality, with an emphasis on equality and responsibility in his theory of equality. In the first place I analyze the significance of "equal concern and respect" and "ethical individualism". Secondly, I investigate Dworkin's institutions of justice focused on equality of resources and point out the theoretical implications of "ambition-sensitive, endowment-insensitive". For defended "justice as equality", in conclusion this article discussed two philosophical controversies: "Do liberty and equality conflict?" and "How is liberal community possible?". |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。