查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 歌德的憂鬱:世界文學與文學普世性的反思
- Translation and World Literature in Goethe's West-East Divan
- 比較乎?世界乎?文學的去從
- 意義遲後:文學的當代位置
- 評Gang Zhou (周剛), «Placing the Modern Chinese Vernacular in Transnational Literature» (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011)
- 臺灣文學的比較文學研究:一個研究概念的再思考
- 世界文學時代的來臨
- 何為世界主義?誰是世界主義者?--基於政治哲學、比較文學學科史的考察
- 數字人文與世界文學:重釋“歌德與世界文學”一案
- 何謂“世界文學”?
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 歌德的憂鬱:世界文學與文學普世性的反思=Melancholia Goetheana: Some Reflections about Universal Literature and World-literature |
---|---|
作 者 | 薛佛; 林志明; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 41:11=486 2014.11[民103.11] |
頁 次 | 頁23-38 |
專 輯 | 普世性、藝術家與美學專題 |
分類號 | 875.463 |
關鍵詞 | 歌德; 比較文學; 世界文學; 普世文學; Goethe; Comparative literature; World literature; Weltliteratur; Universal literature; Universalliteratur; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 近十多年來,歌德提出的「世界文學」問題又再度成為文學研究的當前議題,尤其是在比較文學領域之中。但今日歷史的、地緣政治的及經濟的語境,顯然和歐洲十八、十九世紀之交的語境大不相同。我們所生活的是後殖民、多元文化、多極政治及經濟全球化的語境,而這和持歐洲中心觀點的歌德所處在的世界顯然不同。就此而言,大部份有關普世文學的當代思考是具爭論性的。本文針對歌德的世界文學意念以及其浪漫主義近親、普世文學(Universalliteratur)的意念進行辯護。本文將著重於其中隱含的的世界主義及人類學元素,並嘗試指出它們並不像我們所曾以為地那樣單純。 |
英文摘要 | Since some decades the goethean question of "Weltliteratur" is again on the agenda of literary studies and especially comparative literature. But the historical, geo-political and economical contexts of today have apparently nothing in common with the European context characterizing the turn of the XVIIIth to the XIXth century. We are living in a post-colonial, multicultural, politically multi-centered and economically globalized context which seems very different from the « eurocentric » view of the goethean world. So most of contemporary reflections about Universal Literature are polemical. I would like to say some words in defense of the goethean notion of "Weltliteratur" as well as of its romantic cousin of "Universalliteratur": I shall foreground their cosmopolitical and anthropological components and try to show that they were much less naive than we believe them to have been. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。