查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 三代居代間干擾行為之嚴重度及同意度調查
- An Analysis of Referral Initiative, Severity, and the Return of Older Population in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital
- 評定量表標示語之心理量尺值研究:頻率及同意度詞
- 院內黴菌血流感染之調查
- 滾子鍊條潛在性失效模式探討
- 加護病房評估疾病嚴重度之資料正確性
- 泵及汽機振動評估之標準及規範
- Early Detection of Myocardial Contusion in Patients with Blunt Chest Trauma
- Referral Severity, Initiative, and Return of Middle Aged Women with Cervical Cancer
- 中山高速公路肇事特性時空差異比較分析
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 三代居代間干擾行為之嚴重度及同意度調查=The Severity and Agreement of Disruptive Behavior among Three Generations Residents |
---|---|
作 者 | 林志強; 徐南麗; 陳宗鵠; 葉明森; | 書刊名 | 健康與建築雜誌 |
卷 期 | 1:4 2014.10[民103.10] |
頁 次 | 頁23-30 |
分類號 | 544.18 |
關鍵詞 | 三代居; 代間干擾; 嚴重度; 同意度; Three-generation residents; Intergenerational interference; Severity; Agreement; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 背景:三代之間如何一起住的健康快樂,住的有尊嚴是一個常態性的課題,也是歷來研究者所希望解開的議題。三代居是華人地區最能表示傳統孝道的家居生活,但也是許多人表達望而遠之的態度,代間干擾常常是許多人無法接受三代同居的重要因素。代間的生活行為若能以嚴重度及同意度的調查發覺住宅空間干擾的先後次序,就可以在平面規劃時作適當配置,提早因應。目的:本研究目的1.了解三代居代間干擾嚴重度及同意度,含飲食、秘密、儲藏、睡眠、宴客及休閒等行為得分。2.探討影響三代居代間干擾嚴重度及同意度之有關因素驗證研究假設。希望藉由問卷調查結果能回饋到建築住宅設計上,找出干擾度最嚴重到不嚴重的先後次序,配合平面空間擺設的優先選擇。方法:本研究採用問卷調查法,方便取樣方式進行,以大台北地區62位年滿21歲為家庭組織成員為樣本,所蒐集資料以次數分配、百分比、平均值、標準差、t檢定、單因子變異數分析等方法,並以SPSS軟體,進行資料處理與分析結果:研究結果顯示,在代間干擾嚴重度平均分數為2.46分,以「儲藏行為」得分最高2.71,依序為秘密行為2.64,睡眠行為2.44,飲食行為2.4,休閒行為2.29及宴客行為2.25;在代間干擾同意度平均分數為2.77分,以「儲藏行為」為最高2.98,依序為秘密行為2.94,睡眠行為2.78,飲食行為2.77、休閒行為2.6 及宴客行為2.53。在干擾嚴重度上:因職業的不同,在秘密行為上有顯著差異;因設備空間干擾最大的不同,在宴客行為上有顯著差異。在干擾同意度上:因年齡、職業的不同,在秘密行為有顯著差異;因住宅所有的不同,在睡眠行為有顯著差異。結論/實務應用:本研究發覺儲藏行為在嚴重度及同意度上為干擾最嚴重者,由此研究可以在建築配置手法在各個空間配置儲藏室或儲藏櫃因應,其他依序干擾行為則可採用不同配置手法,本研究重點是希望在三代居事先規劃時就可以提前做好因應的萬全準備,如同日本二世帶住宅有點黏又不太黏的代間生活規劃,解決代間干擾的困擾。 |
英文摘要 | Background: How the three-generations live together happily and healthy and with dignity is the normal task, which is also the issue researchers hope to solve constantly. Three-generations living is the best representation of living way for traditional Chinese filial within Chinese area; but there are also many people show their attitude as sitting on the fence. The intergenerational interference is often an important factor for many people who cannot accept three-generations living together. If we can discover the priorities of living space interference with the survey of severity and agreement for the living behavior of intergeneration, we will able to cope with them in advance with properly configuration when drawing the floor plan. Purposes: The purposes of this study are as following: 1. to understand the severity and agreement of intergenerational interference under three-generation living, including the score of diet, secret, storage, sleep, banquet and leisure behaviors. 2. to discuss the relevant factors which affect the severity and agreement of intergenerational interference under three-generation living, and to verify the hypothesis of this study. We hope to get feed back into the design of residential buildings by questionnaire; and to identify the priority from the most severe degree to the least one, with the choice priority of layout. Methods: This study is conducted with the questionnaire survey with convenience sampling. We take 62 family members who turn to 21 years old as the sample in greater Taipei area. Then we utilize SPSS statistical software to conduct data processing and analysis by the following methods: frequency distribution, percentage, average value, standard deviation, t-test, and ANOVA. Results: The results show that the average score of severity for intergenerational interference is 2.46, in which the "storage behavior" is the highest score for 2.71; decreased in the order are: secret behavior is 2.64, sleep behavior is 2.44, diet behavior is 2.4, leisure behavior is 2.29 and banquet behavior is 2.25. The average score of agreement for intergenerational interference is 2.77, in which the "storage behavior" is the highest score for 2.98; decreased in the order are: secret behavior is 2.94, sleep behavior is 2.78, diet behavior is 2.77, leisure behavior is 2.6 and banquet behavior is 2.53. In terms of the severity of the interference: there are significant differences in secret behavior for the different occupations; there are significant differences in banquet behavior for device space interference with the maximum differences. In terms of the agreement of the interference: there are significant differences in secret behavior for the different ages and occupations; there are significant differences in sleep behavior for different housing ownership. Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The result in this study found that storage behavior is the most severe degree of interference on the severity and agreement, from which we can configure storage room or cabinet in response to the various space when laying out the architectural configuration; while other interference behaviors can adopt different configurations in sequence. This study is aimed at coping with completely preparation in advance when planning the three-generations living. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。