查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 海盜贖金於海上保險之性質研究
- 海盜攻擊損害與劫持贖金之保險研究
- Study on the Differences and Similarities between the Four Saving Acts under 1906 Marine Insurance Act, UK
- 有關海盜暴行所生損失與保險
- 海盜贖金應否列入共同海損之探討
- 索馬利亞海盜:國家與國際組職之因應
- 海上保險中之海盜危險事故範圍及其相對保險演進之探討
- 索馬利亞海盜案對日本安全政策之影響分析
- 索馬利亞問題:肯亞奈洛比西門購物中心事件後國際社會聚焦的索馬利亞問題及其發展
- 中共海軍的新邊疆:解放軍海軍於索馬利亞海域護航任務與中國反海盜政策
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 海盜贖金於海上保險之性質研究=Study on the Nature of Pirate Ransoms in Marine |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 曾文瑞; | 書刊名 | 運輸計劃 |
卷期 | 43:3 2014.09[民103.09] |
頁次 | 頁315-341 |
分類號 | 587.66 |
關鍵詞 | 海上保險; 海盜; 贖金; 索馬利亞; 共同海損費用; 損害防阻費用; 救助費用; 單獨費用; Marine insurance; Piracy; Ransom; Somalia; General average expense; Sue & labour expense; Salvage charges; Particular charges; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 國際商會(International Chamber of Commerce, ICC)轄屬的國際海事局(International Maritime Bureau,簡稱1MB)統計資料指出,自2008年至2012年,位於「非洲之角」海域,已累積有312起實際的攻擊事件。當船隻被劫持後,海盜往往要求巨額的贖金才願意將船舶及海員釋放,重重影響了航運產業。支付贖金的目的乃是為了要收回船舶及貨載,英國自從1782年贖金法廢止後,支付贖金的行為已不再被認為是不合法的行為,所以贖金變成是以減輕損害為目的,且可自保險人處獲得賠償的合理費用。當船、貨共同航行時,贖金的支付乃係以共同安全為目的,故可以構成共同海損行為,然而若是空船航行,則可以損害防阻費用由保險人賠償。但買賣金的性質則與1906年英國海上保險法第65(2)所規定的自願性行為,所產生的救助費用概念並不相同。 |
英文摘要 | From 2008 to 2012, 312 actual hijacks had been recorded by the lnternational Chamber of Commerce (ICC) of the lnternational Maritime Bureau (1MB). Once a vessel has been hijacked, the stakes are raised by the pirates' escalating demands for larger sums of ransom money to release both vessels and crews. Piracy affects the entire shipping industry, i. e. a ransom paid for the purposes of releasing a ship and cargo from pirates. Payment of ransoms has no longer been considered illegal since the Ransom Act 1782 was repealed. Thus, ransoms were paid for the purposes of minimizing damages covered by the policy. In the case of case-carrying ships, it is likely that the ship-owner and cargo-owner will share a common interest in the preservation of both; the payment of a ransom therefore constitutes a generally normal act. Where a vessel is in ballast, the payment of a ransom by ship-owner can be recoverable as a legal or labor expense, but it is likely to fall foul of the requirement of voluntariness in the definition of salvage in traditional maritime law, as well as salvage charges provided in Section 65(2) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。