查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 股份有限公司董事報酬請求權之研究=A Study of the Quantum Meruit Claim of the Director of a Company Limited by Shares |
---|---|
作 者 | 戴銘昇; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷 期 | 138 2014.09[民103.09] |
頁 次 | 頁181-235 |
分類號 | 587.253 |
關鍵詞 | 報酬; 報酬請求權; 董事; 薪資報酬委員會; 薪酬委員會; 經營與所有分離; 默示報酬; Compensation; Quantum meruit claim; Director; Compensation committee; Separation of ownership and control; Implied compensation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 公司法第196條第1項雖有對於董事的報酬決定程序之規定,惟未經此一程序時,董事是否有報酬請求權?此一問題,我國實務及學說之見解紛呈,頗具爭議。若依據美國法制,董事之報酬原則上限於有明示約定時始能請求。若依據日本法制,通說認為未經法定程序者,董事無報酬請求權。本文認為只有在董事與公司原有約定報酬,股東會選任董事時未同時決議董事報酬,而董事在「就任前」便已向公司請求報酬時,才會產生董事有無報酬請求權之爭議。而依據民法第547條之規定,董事應可向公司主張報酬請求權。不過,若從立法論而言,似可考慮修改公司法,明定董事必有報酬,以建立良好的公司治理。 |
英文摘要 | Although Article 196 I of the Company Act provides the determining procedure of a director’s compensation, may a director file a quantum meruit claim without this procedure? Regarding this question, practices and scholarship in Taiwan are in sharp disagreement. According to the U.S. legal regime, in order that a director may receive compensation, there must have been an express contract. According to the Japanese legal regime, the prevailing opinion is that without the legal procedure, a director cannot receive compensation. This study thinks that the issue whether a director has a quantum meruit claim only occurs in the following situation: a director had an agreement of receiving compensation with the company, he was elected as director at a shareholders’ meeting without adopting a resolution to give him compensation, he claimed compensation to company before assuming that post. According to Article 547 of Civil Law, a director should possess a right to claim compensation from the company. But, in order to establish good corporate governance, a better solution may be to modify the current Company Act so as to provide that a director should have a right to claim compensation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。