查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 新興民主國家之公民社會及參與民主:臺灣與捷克之個案研究
- 虛妄的「新臺灣人」與難產的「公民社會」
- 臺灣參與全球公民社會的策略:臺灣如何營造對全球公民社會的影響力
- 臺灣社區大學的創發與建構公民社會
- 書評回應[回應姚人多評駱明正(Ming-cheng M. Lo), Doctors within Borders: Profession, Ethnicity, and Modernity in Colonial Taiwan (Berkeley , Calif.:University of California Press, 2002)]
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Coal Ash Artificial Reefs at Wan-Li, Northern Taiwan
- 記臺灣蘭科植物相新記錄種--緣毛松蘭
- 臺灣的氣候變化--氣溫和降水
- Change and Stability in the Dietary System of A Prehistoric: Coastal Population in Southern Taiwan: A Research Design
- Diurnal Vertical Distribution of Ichthyoplankton in I-Lan Bay, NE Taiwan
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 新興民主國家之公民社會及參與民主:臺灣與捷克之個案研究=Civil Society and Participatory Democracy in the New Democracies:A Comparison Between Taiwan and Czech Republic |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭得興; | 書刊名 | 法治與公共治理學報 |
卷 期 | 1 2013.12[民102.12] |
頁 次 | 頁59-99 |
分類號 | 541.44 |
關鍵詞 | 公民社會; 參與民主; 臺灣; 捷克; Civil society; Participatory democracy; Taiwan; Czech Republic; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 公民社會儼然成為後極權國家或後威權國家鞏固民主的最主要途徑,本文從公民 參與的實證研究探討新興民主國家的公民社會與參與式民主之建構。近代西方公民社 會的發展是建立在現代化的基礎上,外顯的指標包括政治與經濟的發展。本研究選取 台灣(後威權國家)及捷克(後極權國家)做為二個新興民主國家的個案分析,結果 發現台灣與捷克儘管在政治權利及公民自由、經濟發展與民主自我評價等指標皆高於 其他大部份新興民主國家,然而其公民參與的重要組成成分,包括公民組織會員與公 民行動等許多指標皆落後於其他新興民主國家。 顯然,現代性並未有效提升台灣與捷克的公民參與。本文亦微觀比較台灣與捷克 公民參與之情況,結果發現儘管二國在現代化指標高度發展的情形相仿,但公民參與 的形態卻不盡相同,捷克民眾大多透過公民組織成員的身分參與公民行動,公民社團 成為表達公共意見的重要管道。在台灣參與公民社團的人口比例不低於捷克,不過台 灣的公民社團比較沒有承擔扮演組織公民活動的角色。另外,台灣與捷克在年齡或世 代效應的變項上並不能充分解釋公民參與,然而教育與收入這二個變項仍是重要的。 社經地位要素只能部份解釋公民行動的情形,而年齡、教育及收入等自變項與公民行 動的相關性在台灣與捷克的情況是類似的。 |
英文摘要 | This paper explores the construction of civil society and participatory democracy in the neo-democracies through the empirical research on civic participation. Obviously, civil society already becomes one of the most prominent approaches to consolidate democracy among the post totalitarian and post authoritarian countries. The development of modern western civil society is built up on the basis of modernization, whose manifest indicators include political and economical development. This research selects Taiwan (the post authoritarian country) and the Czech Republic (the post totalitarian/ communist country) as the case study of neo-democracies. The results present that although the level of political right, civil freedom, economical development and democracy self-evaluation is higher than most of the other neo-democracies, the key components of civil participation, including of membership of civic organization and civic actions are behind them. Modernity appears not to effectively promote civic participation in Taiwan and Czech Republic. This paper also makes a micro comparison of civil participation between Taiwan and Czech Republic. Although the similar situation of higher modernity exists in Taiwan and Czech Republic, the patterns of civil participation differ. Czech people get used to the civic actions via civic organizations, that is, civic associations are the chief channels to express public opinions. The participatory rate of civic organizations in Taiwan is not lower than in the Czech Republic, but civic organizations seem not to play the part of organizing civic actions in Taiwan. In addition, the variable of generation effect cannot sufficiently explain civil participation in both of Taiwan and Czech Republic; however, the variables of education and income aresignificant. The factors of social and economical status can partly explain the situation of civil participation in Taiwan and Czech Republic. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。