查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 基金規模與投資績效--投資方式之觀點
- 基金績效與基金規模同步走低--國泰及元大投信表現相對較佳
- 基金持股不流動性對共同基金規模與績效關係之影響
- 定期定額與單筆投資之績效評估--蒙地卡羅模擬分析
- 檢視債券型基金績效與流量之動態關連--應用多元隨機波動模式
- 共同基金定期定值式投資策略之績效優勢分析與最適應用情境探討:以臺灣股票型基金為例
- 改良型定期不定值策略於共同基金投資應用之績效優勢分析與投資模式設計--以臺灣股票型基金為例
- 非營利基金會組織基金管理績效之研究
- A Simulation Approach for Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis
- 風險值及RAROC於基金績效評估之運用
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 基金規模與投資績效--投資方式之觀點=Fund Size and Fund Performance--From the Viewpoint of Investing Method |
---|---|
作 者 | 傅英芬; 劉海清; | 書刊名 | 中原企管評論 |
卷 期 | 12:2 2014.10[民103.10] |
頁 次 | 頁51-69 |
分類號 | 563.538 |
關鍵詞 | 基金規模; 基金績效; 單筆投資; 定期定額; Fund size; Fund performance; Lump-sum investing; Dollar-cost averaging method; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文有鑑於國內外文獻對於基金規模與基金績效之間的關係並無一致的結論,因此試圖站在投資人投資方式的觀點,探討採用單筆投資與定期定額投資於大小規模基金之績效差異,此為過去文獻所少見,亦為本文之貢獻。本文的結果發現若以Panel Data複迴歸模型觀察基金規模對基金績效的影響,基金規模與基金之績效(原始報酬率與三因子α)之間呈現顯著負向的關係,若進一步將基金依照規模分成大、中、小規模基金三組,則發現小規模組基金與中規模組基金之單筆投資績效在各個投資期間長度下均顯著優於大規模基金;投資人在單筆投資的方式下,一年以內的短期投資以小規模基金為較佳的選擇,一年以上的中長期投資則選擇中規模基金較佳。而在定期定額方面,定期定額投資中規模基金之績效在3年與5年的情況下,顯著優於定期定額投資於大與小規模基金。整體而言,不論投資方式為何,以投資中規模基金的績效最穩定與優異。 |
英文摘要 | According to the mixed conclusion of the relation between fund size and fund performance of the past literature, this study aims to examine the performance difference between the large and small funds based on the view of two kinds of investing method-lump-sum investing method and dollar-cost averaging method. This is a rare issue and will contribute to the literature. The result of Panel Data multiple regression analysis shows the negative relation between the fund size and fund performance (raw return and three-factor α). This study further divides the funds into large, medium and small funds based on the assets. Regarding the performance of lump-sum investing, the small and medium funds perform significantly better than the large funds in each kind of investing periods. It is better for investors to choose small funds when the investing period is within one year, while choosing medium funds when the investing period is over one year. Regarding the performance of dollar-cost averaging method, the medium funds perform markedly better than the large and small funds in the case of three and five years. Generally, the performance of the medium funds is the most excellent and stable regardless of the two investing methods. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。