查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 雙元自主性的共存與範疇優勢性運作機制 : 以訊息區辨表現降低共同方法變異
- 工作自主經驗與父母教養行為:雙元自主性促進因素的範疇優勢性檢證
- 「臺海八二三戰役」相關因素影響與國軍致勝要訣
- Domain of Attraction of Competitive Systems
- Orientation Dependences and E-field Effect in Relaxor-based Ferroelectric Crystal (PbMg□Nb□O[feb0])□(PbTiO[feb0])□ (PMN-32%PT)
- Coexistence of Algae by Differences in Periodicity of Nutrient Uptake
- 無鉛焊錫合金概論
- 蘇俄「和平共存」戰略發展之研究
- 公眾意見、和平共存與外交政策
- 「和平共存」原則之批判
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 雙元自主性的共存與範疇優勢性運作機制 : 以訊息區辨表現降低共同方法變異=The Coexistence and Domain Superiority Processing of Dual Autonomy : Decreasing Common Method Variance with Message Discernment |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳志文; 葉光輝; | 書刊名 | 中華心理學刊 |
卷 期 | 53:1 2011.03[民100.03] |
頁 次 | 頁59-77 |
分類號 | 177.3 |
關鍵詞 | 共存; 訊息區辨表現; 範疇優勢性; 雙元自主; Coexistence; Domain-superiority; Dual autonomy model; Message; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的在於以訊息區辨表現作為非自陳式的效標變項,透過不同情境操弄的兩個研究,再次驗證雙元自主性模型提出的共存性觀點,並且進一步探討雙元自主性各自有其優勢作用範疇的運作機制。首先,兩個研究的結果顯示:個體的個體化自主性功能主要發揮在與個人範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上;而其關係自主性功能主要作用在與人際範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上。其次,個體唯有已經發展出高度的雙元自主性,才能夠在強調獨立或和諧價值情境的促發下,有效地交互提取身上的個體化自主性與關係自主性,以因應情境需求而發揮相應優勢的訊息區辨表現,支持了模型主張雙元自主性可以共存在單一個體身上的理論觀點(研究二之一和研究二之二);換言之,即便個體在情境下經驗到明確的目標需求,但如果個體缺乏對應目標需求的高自主性能力時,仍無法展現良好的訊結果。 |
英文摘要 | By using objective dependent variables (performances on messages discernment) as criteria, the aims of this article are to reexamine the coexistence and domain-superiority claims of dual autonomy model (DAM) in two successive studies. The results showed that (1) all two studies reconfirmed the domain-superiority claim of DAM by manifesting that individuating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in intrapersonal domain situation, however relating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in interpersonal domain situation; (2) the effects of situation manipulations could be found only within the adolescents who have higher corresponding autonomous capacity; this means that individuating autonomy and relating autonomy could be coexisting within an individual and an individual is capable of switching these two autonomy in different situations appeal (in study 2A and study 2B); (3) even under the situations in activating the pursuing of individuating/relating related goal, if the adolescences who do not hold the corresponding autonomous capacity, when compare to the adolescents of control group, they still cannot perform higher messages discernment significantly in the task (in study 2B). That is, the extent of performance on messages discernment was the outcome of the interacting effect between situational activation and individual’s autonomous capacity. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。