查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 論涉外法律行為方式之準據法
- 侵權行為的準據法--最高法院九十七年臺上字第二四八二號民事判決
- 論跨國侵權行為成立要件之準據法--以行為地為連繫因素之探討
- 涉外侵權行為之準據法與再論選法規則之強行性--最高法院九十七年臺上字第二四八二號判決評釋
- 海峽兩岸涉外離婚法律適用規則之比較與檢視--兼論《羅馬規則Ⅲ》對兩岸新規之借鑒
- 涉外民事事件之當事人適格問題--最高法院八十三年度臺上字第一六九號、八十六年度臺上字第三七八九號判決評釋
- 國際私法連繫因素實體化初論--以涉外侵權行為選法規範為中心
- 認領準據法之研究
- 海牙國際私法公約之研究--以一九七八年海牙關於夫妻財產制之國際私法公約為中心
- 國際私法行為地法原則中行為「地」之確定
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論涉外法律行為方式之準據法=The Law Applicable to the Formalities for Juridical Act |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 何佳芳; | 書刊名 | 國立中正大學法學集刊 |
卷期 | 43 2014.05[民103.05] |
頁次 | 頁293-327 |
分類號 | 579.92 |
關鍵詞 | 法律行為; 準據法; 消費者契約; 國際私法; 單獨行為; 行為地; 慣常居所地; 日本法的適用通則法; 1961年海牙遺囑方式準據法公約; 羅馬規則Ⅰ; Juridical act; Governing law; Consumer contract; International private law; The unilateral act; The place where the act was done; Habitual residence; Japanese act on general rules for application of laws; Convention of 5 October 1961 on the conflicts of laws relating to the form of testamentary dispositions; Rome I; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 法律行為之方式涉及該行為之成立與否,究應適用何國法律為其準據法,對於當事人權益影響重大,新法雖已針對舊法不足之處,在架構及內容上進行了部分修正,但仍有部分不足有待進一步探討。例如,在系爭法律行為之「成立」準據法與「效力」準據法不同時,究應以何者作為該行為之準據法,不無疑義;再者,於行為地的確定方面,新法雖增訂了有關隔地契約之行為方式準據法,但對位於不同法域之人所為之「單獨行為」,究應以何處作為其行為地則未有明確規範;又如消費者契約等當事人締約地位不平等之契約,站在弱者保護的觀點上,就此類契約方式之準據法,是否應有特殊考量及規範,亦有加以檢討之必要。本文擬藉由此次涉外民事法律適用法之修訂,就有關涉外法律行為方式之準據法加以探討,希望能提供將來學界論述或實務適用上些許之助益。 |
英文摘要 | The formalities for juridical act will involve in whether the legal act is constituted or not and which country's law shall be the governing law in this regard, which will significantly affect the party's right. While some shortages have been supplemented by the new act, there are still some insufficient parts which still need to be further discussed. Take for example, if there is a discrepancy of governing laws between the formation and the effectiveness of the act, which law shall be the governing law is still arguable. In addition, the new act is silent on the location of the act to decide the governing law for the unilateral act conducted by each party in the different territory. Finally, it is necessary for further discussion on whether there are other considerations and regulations for the consumer contract due to the unfair position in nature for the execution of the contract. This article hopes to provide the fields of the scholarship and legal system with some helps in the issues in question. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。